136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18642087)
1. Whatever you want? Beyond the patient in medical law.
Huxtable R
Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):288-301. PubMed ID: 18642087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The right to live and the right to die].
Zeeh J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Apr; 156(6):45-8; quiz 49-50. PubMed ID: 24919297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Best interests, public interest, and the power of the medical profession.
Coggon J
Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 18642085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B.
Coleman D; Drake S
J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 12161578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Best interests, the power of the medical profession, and the power of the judiciary.
Quigley M
Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 18679803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twenty-five years after Quinlan: a review of the jurisprudence of death and dying.
Cantor NL
J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):182-96. PubMed ID: 11508195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Getting what we should from doctors: rethinking patient autonomy and the doctor-patient relationship.
Dworkin RB
Health Matrix Clevel; 2003; 13(2):235-96. PubMed ID: 15027422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of the courts in terminating life-sustaining medical treatment.
Leibson CM
Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 7737849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada.
Downie J
J Palliat Care; 2004; 20(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 15511032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Peters PG
Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the patient's right to die evolving into a duty to die?: Medical decision making and ethical evaluations in health care.
Sprung CL; Eidelman LA; Steinberg A
J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Feb; 3(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 9238609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical issues at the end of life.
Young EW
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Charting a course through difficult legislative waters: tribunal decisions on life-sustaining measures.
Willmott L; White B
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 15957587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Being Ms B: B, autonomy and the nature of legal regulation.
Morgan D; Veitch K
Syd Law Rev; 2004 Mar; 26(1):107-30. PubMed ID: 16485366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal consensus about foregoing life-sustaining treatment: its status and its prospects.
Meisel A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):309-45. PubMed ID: 10123320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Best interest: a philosophical critique.
Holm S; Edgar A
Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 18642084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Law. The right to choose.
Winskill C
Health Serv J; 2002 May; 112(5806):35, 37. PubMed ID: 12108399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
