These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18642087)

  • 21. The case of Ms B and the "right to die".
    Slowther AM
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):243. PubMed ID: 12161579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Grasping the nettle--what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B).
    Tweeddale MG
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):236-7. PubMed ID: 12161576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Family involvement, independence, and patient autonomy in practice.
    Gilbar R
    Med Law Rev; 2011; 19(2):192-234. PubMed ID: 21543361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forgoing life-sustaining treatment: limits to the consensus. Part 2.
    Veatch RM
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1993 Mar; 3(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 10124847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comment on Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) [2002] 2 All England Reports 449.
    Stauch M
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; 28(4):232-3. PubMed ID: 12161574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Best interests" and withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from an adult who lacks capacity in the parens patriae jurisdiction.
    Willmott L; White B; Smith MK
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):920-41. PubMed ID: 25087370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
    Stewart C
    Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How do we withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy?
    Rieth KA
    Nurs Manage; 1999 Oct; 30(10):20-5; quiz 25-6. PubMed ID: 15116442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The limitations of the Dutch concept of euthanasia.
    Sleeboom M
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2003 Jan; 13(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17117538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can a patient refuse a psychiatric consultation to evaluate decision-making capacity?
    Wenger NS; Halpern J
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 7841473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The loved ones: families, intimates and patient autonomy.
    O'Donovan K; Gilbar R
    Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars); 2003 May; 23(2):332-58. PubMed ID: 16025652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of courts in terminating nutrition and hydration for incompetent patients.
    Wintersheimer DC
    Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 7737850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The ethics of assisted suicide.
    Paterson I
    Nurs Times; 2003 Feb 18-24; 99(7):30-1. PubMed ID: 12655749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Egregious inaction: five years later after Of Life and Death.
    Downie J
    Health Law Rev; 2000; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15706705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Talking about dying: ethical obligations and Maryland state law.
    DeRenzo EG; Schwartz J; Selinger S
    Md Med; 2004; 5(3):39-41. PubMed ID: 15495859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Walking in their shoes: paying respect to incompetent patients.
    Welch DD
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 42(6):1617-40. PubMed ID: 11650433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Best interests in the MCA 2005--what can healthcare law learn from family law?
    Choudhry S
    Health Care Anal; 2008 Sep; 16(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 18677570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Non-voluntary passive euthanasia: the social consequences of euphemisms.
    Sayers GM
    Eur J Health Law; 2007 Nov; 14(3):221-40. PubMed ID: 18229760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.