381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18642967)
1. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.
Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic collimator angle adjustments during volumetric modulated arc therapy to account for prostate rotations.
de Boer J; Wolf AL; Szeto YZ; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1009-16. PubMed ID: 25618782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the fixed gantry angle approximation on dosimetric accuracy for helical tomotherapy plans.
Tudor GS; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011711. PubMed ID: 23298081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple geometric algorithm to predict optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS; Nugent Z
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17985640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring of mechanical errors and their dosimetric impact throughout the course of non-coplanar continuous volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Hirashima H; Nakamura M; Miyabe Y; Uto M; Nakamura K; Mizowaki T
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Feb; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 29444693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical implementation of Dosimetry Check™ for TomoTherapy
Chung E; Kwon D; Park T; Kang H; Chung Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):193-199. PubMed ID: 30354001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans.
Staton RJ; Langen KM; Kupelian PA; Meeks SL
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2881-8. PubMed ID: 19673187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential benefits of dosimetric VMAT tracking verified with 3D film measurements.
Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2162. PubMed ID: 27147328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of MLC leaf position, collimator rotation angle, and gantry rotation angle errors on intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Bai S; Li G; Wang M; Jiang Q; Zhang Y; Wei Y
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 23402928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system.
Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy.
Langen KM; Lu W; Ngwa W; Willoughby TR; Chauhan B; Meeks SL; Kupelian PA; Olivera G
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7073-86. PubMed ID: 19015580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of changing modulation and pitch parameters on tomotherapy delivery quality assurance plans.
Binny D; Lancaster CM; Harris S; Sylvander SR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):87–105. PubMed ID: 26699293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A general method for the definition of margin recipes depending on the treatment technique applied in helical tomotherapy prostate plans.
Sevillano D; Mínguez C; Sánchez A; Sánchez-Reyes A
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 26585538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Milan T; Grogan G; Ebert MA; Rowshanfarzad P
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):1984-1994. PubMed ID: 30870581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Filmless methods for quality assurance of Tomotherapy using ArcCHECK.
Yang B; Wong WK; Geng H; Lam WW; Ho YW; Kwok WM; Cheung KY; Yu SK
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 28044341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Shah AP; Chen SS; Strauss JB; Kirk MC; Coleman JL; Coon AB; Miller C; Dickler A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 19564784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
