These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18642967)

  • 1. Dosimetric impacts of gantry angle misalignment on prostate cancer treatment using helical tomotherapy.
    Su FC; Shi C; Crownover R; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Aug; 7(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 18642967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic collimator angle adjustments during volumetric modulated arc therapy to account for prostate rotations.
    de Boer J; Wolf AL; Szeto YZ; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1009-16. PubMed ID: 25618782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the fixed gantry angle approximation on dosimetric accuracy for helical tomotherapy plans.
    Tudor GS; Thomas SJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011711. PubMed ID: 23298081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple geometric algorithm to predict optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
    Potrebko PS; McCurdy BM; Butler JB; El-Gubtan AS; Nugent Z
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17985640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of mechanical errors and their dosimetric impact throughout the course of non-coplanar continuous volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
    Hirashima H; Nakamura M; Miyabe Y; Uto M; Nakamura K; Mizowaki T
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Feb; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 29444693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical implementation of Dosimetry Check™ for TomoTherapy
    Chung E; Kwon D; Park T; Kang H; Chung Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):193-199. PubMed ID: 30354001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
    McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric effects of rotational output variation and x-ray target degradation on helical tomotherapy plans.
    Staton RJ; Langen KM; Kupelian PA; Meeks SL
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2881-8. PubMed ID: 19673187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential benefits of dosimetric VMAT tracking verified with 3D film measurements.
    Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2162. PubMed ID: 27147328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of MLC leaf position, collimator rotation angle, and gantry rotation angle errors on intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Bai S; Li G; Wang M; Jiang Q; Zhang Y; Wei Y
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 23402928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
    Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system.
    Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy.
    Langen KM; Lu W; Ngwa W; Willoughby TR; Chauhan B; Meeks SL; Kupelian PA; Olivera G
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7073-86. PubMed ID: 19015580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of changing modulation and pitch parameters on tomotherapy delivery quality assurance plans.
    Binny D; Lancaster CM; Harris S; Sylvander SR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):87–105. PubMed ID: 26699293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general method for the definition of margin recipes depending on the treatment technique applied in helical tomotherapy prostate plans.
    Sevillano D; Mínguez C; Sánchez A; Sánchez-Reyes A
    Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 26585538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Milan T; Grogan G; Ebert MA; Rowshanfarzad P
    Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):1984-1994. PubMed ID: 30870581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Filmless methods for quality assurance of Tomotherapy using ArcCHECK.
    Yang B; Wong WK; Geng H; Lam WW; Ho YW; Kwok WM; Cheung KY; Yu SK
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 28044341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dosimetric analysis comparing treatment of low-risk prostate cancer with TomoTherapy versus static field intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Shah AP; Chen SS; Strauss JB; Kirk MC; Coleman JL; Coon AB; Miller C; Dickler A
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 19564784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
    Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.