BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18643823)

  • 1. Combining occurrence and toxicity information to identify priorities for drinking-water mixture research.
    Ryker SJ; Small MJ
    Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):653-66. PubMed ID: 18643823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
    Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
    Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
    Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of chemical mixtures in public health practice.
    de Rosa CT; El-Masri HA; Pohl H; Cibulas W; Mumtaz MM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2004; 7(5):339-50. PubMed ID: 15371239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concentration, chlorination, and chemical analysis of drinking water for disinfection byproduct mixtures health effects research: U.S. EPA's Four Lab Study.
    Pressman JG; Richardson SD; Speth TF; Miltner RJ; Narotsky MG; Hunter ES; Rice GE; Teuschler LK; McDonald A; Parvez S; Krasner SW; Weinberg HS; McKague AB; Parrett CJ; Bodin N; Chinn R; Lee CF; Simmons JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7184-92. PubMed ID: 20496936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six interaction profiles for simple mixtures.
    Pohl HR; Roney N; Wilbur S; Hansen H; De Rosa CT
    Chemosphere; 2003 Oct; 53(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 12892681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health risk assessment of drinking water contaminants in Canada: the applicability of mixture risk assessment methods.
    Krishnan K; Paterson J; Williams DT
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 9356281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health-based screening levels to evaluate U.S. Geological Survey ground water quality data.
    Toccalino PL; Norman JE
    Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 17054535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A weight-of-evidence approach for assessing interactions in chemical mixtures.
    Mumtaz MM; Durkin PR
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1992; 8(6):377-406. PubMed ID: 7570620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct data manipulation for local decision analysis as applied to the problem of arsenic in drinking water from tube wells in Bangladesh.
    Gelman A; Trevisani M; Lu H; van Geen A
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1597-612. PubMed ID: 15660615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing the noncancer toxicity of mixtures using concepts from the TTC and quantitative models of uncertainty in mixture toxicity.
    Price PS; Hollnagel HM; Zabik JM
    Risk Anal; 2009 Nov; 29(11):1534-48. PubMed ID: 19886945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
    Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
    Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying US populations for the study of health effects related to drinking water arsenic.
    Frost FJ; Muller T; Petersen HV; Thomson B; Tollestrup K
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 May; 13(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 12743617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the similarity of complex drinking-water disinfection by-product mixtures: overview of the issues.
    Rice GE; Teuschler LK; Bull RJ; Simmons JE; Feder PI
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(7):429-36. PubMed ID: 19267305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chemical mixtures in untreated water from public-supply wells in the U.S.--occurrence, composition, and potential toxicity.
    Toccalino PL; Norman JE; Scott JC
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug; 431():262-70. PubMed ID: 22687436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treating and drinking well water in the presence of health risks from arsenic contamination: results from a U.S. hot spot.
    Shaw WD; Walker M; Benson M
    Risk Anal; 2005 Dec; 25(6):1531-43. PubMed ID: 16506980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of toxic interactions of heavy metals in a multicomponent mixture using Lepidium sativum and Spirodela polyrrhiza.
    Montvydiene D; Marciulioniene D
    Environ Toxicol; 2004 Aug; 19(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 15269907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research issues underlying the four-lab study: integrated disinfection by-products mixtures research.
    Simmons JE; Richardson SD; Teuschler LK; Miltner RJ; Speth TF; Schenck KM; Hunter ES; Rice G
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(17):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18636387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data considerations for regulation of water contaminants.
    Schoeny R; Haber L; Dourson M
    Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(2-3):217-24. PubMed ID: 16483704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A feasibility study of cumulative risk assessment methods for drinking water disinfection by-product mixtures.
    Teuschler LK; Rice GE; Wilkes CR; Lipscomb JC; Power FW
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Apr 23-May 28; 67(8-10):755-77. PubMed ID: 15192867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.