These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18646244)
21. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample. Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pilot Study of a Software-Supported Protocol for Second-Trimester Ultrasound Screening. Bultez T; Bernard JP; Metzger U; Ville Y; Salomon LJ J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Nov; 36(11):2279-2285. PubMed ID: 28600890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Salomon LJ; Alfirevic Z; Berghella V; Bilardo C; Hernandez-Andrade E; Johnsen SL; Kalache K; Leung KY; Malinger G; Munoz H; Prefumo F; Toi A; Lee W; Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 20842655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Quality-improvement program for ultrasound-based fetal anatomy screening using large-scale clinical audit. Yaqub M; Kelly B; Stobart H; Napolitano R; Noble JA; Papageorghiou AT Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 54(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 30302849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of ultrasound speed choice on the quality of the second-trimester fetal ultrasound examination in obese women. Puissegur A; Salesse N; Delabaere A; Chauveau B; Ouchchane L; Debost-Legrand A; Lemery D Diagn Interv Imaging; 2021 Feb; 102(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 32819887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in evaluation of fetal brain anatomy]. Pavlova E; Markov D; Ivanov S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2014; 53(2):11-7. PubMed ID: 25098103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Organ-specific learning curves of sonographers performing first-trimester anatomical screening and impact of score-based evaluation on ultrasound image quality. Bardi F; Bakker M; Elvan-Taşpınar A; Kenkhuis MJA; Fridrichs J; Bakker MK; Birnie E; Bilardo CM PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279770. PubMed ID: 36730474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Online audit and feedback improve fetal second-trimester four-chamber view images: a randomised controlled trial. Jaudi S; Granger B; Herpin CN; Fries N; Du Montcel ST; Dommergues M Prenat Diagn; 2013 Oct; 33(10):959-64. PubMed ID: 23740822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Quality control of prenatal ultrasound. A role for biometry]. Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):683-91. PubMed ID: 16959525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Assessment of the sonographer's knowledge on the second trimester ultrasound recommendations of the National Technical Committee of Ultrasound]. Matar M; Picone O; Dalmon C; Ayoubi JM J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Sep; 42(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 23764227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of conventional and PureWave Crystal transducer in obstetric sonography. Yu YM; Chen M; Xiong Y; Chau MM; Li RS; Lau TK J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jul; 22(7):616-21. PubMed ID: 19488956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [DEGUM grade I quality standards in obstetric ultrasound diagnosis during the 19th-22nd week of pregnancy]. Eichhorn KH; Schramm T; Bald R; Hansmann M; Gembruch U Ultraschall Med; 2006 Apr; 27(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 16612728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of preliminary training on quantitative evaluation of sonographer performance in the fetal morphology ultrasound examination. Lam P; Samson A; Magotti R; Benzie R Australas J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Aug; 16(3):142-146. PubMed ID: 28191188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Auditing fetal nasal bone images in the first trimester of pregnancy: results from a peer review program. Palermo FG; Albuquerque Dde P; Martins WP; Araujo Júnior E; Bruns RF J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(17):2874-7. PubMed ID: 26465391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Utilization of the nuchal translucency image-scoring method during training of new examiners. Herman A; Maymon R; Dreazen E; Zohav E; Segal O; Segal S; Weinraub Z Fetal Diagn Ther; 1999; 14(4):234-9. PubMed ID: 10420048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts. McLennan AC; Schluter PJ J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 19032393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The subjective assessment of echogenic fetal bowel. Harrison KL; Martinez D; Mason G Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 16(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 11169345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. First-trimester sonography: is the fetus exposed to high levels of acoustic energy? Sheiner E; Shoham-Vardi I; Hussey MJ; Pombar X; Strassner HT; Freeman J; Abramowicz JS J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 Jun; 35(5):245-9. PubMed ID: 17410588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The utility of detailed first trimester ultrasound examination in abnormal fetal nuchal translucency. Bronshtein M; Zimmer EZ; Blazer S Prenat Diagn; 2008 Nov; 28(11):1037-41. PubMed ID: 18925580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]