These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18646244)

  • 81. Minimum acceptable standards for digital compression of a fetal ultrasound video-clip.
    Begg L; Chan FY; Edie G; Hockey R; Wootton R
    J Telemed Telecare; 2001; 7 Suppl 2():88-90. PubMed ID: 11747673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Dimensionless squared jerk: An objective differential to assess experienced and novice probe movement in obstetric ultrasound.
    Dromey BP; Ahmed S; Vasconcelos F; Mazomenos E; Kunpalin Y; Ourselin S; Deprest J; David AL; Stoyanov D; Peebles DM
    Prenat Diagn; 2021 Jan; 41(2):271-277. PubMed ID: 33103808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [Report of the French "conférence nationale de l'échographie obstétricale et fœtale" (CNEOF)-- recommendations for focused prenatal ultrasound].
    Viossat P; Dommergues M; Lansac J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Jun; 43(6):469-71. PubMed ID: 25982782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [Certified sonographic screening and certified biochemical test in early pregnancy].
    Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2002 Jun; 23(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 12168137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. CUSUM: a tool for ongoing assessment of performance.
    Biau DJ; Porcher R; Salomon LJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):252-5. PubMed ID: 18307195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Ultrasound Practice Redesign to Improve Image Quality: Implementation of a Quality Control Sonographer.
    Caserta MP; Bonnett SL; La Valley MC; De Meo S; Bowman AW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1644-1652. PubMed ID: 32771494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Image and report quality in non-obstetric ultrasound examinations undertaken by sonographers: Results of an audit of 3731 cases.
    Freeman S; Cantin P; Gutteridge C; Williams P; Hamilton S; Lam Q; Dubbins P
    Ultrasound; 2022 Feb; 30(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 35173776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Diagnostic image quality in gynaecological ultrasound: Who should measure it, what should we measure and how?
    Cantin P; Knapp K
    Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 27433192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Skill Characterisation of Sonographer Gaze Patterns during Second Trimester Clinical Fetal Ultrasounds using Time Curves.
    Teng C; Lee LH; Lander J; Drukker L; Papageorghiou AT; Noble AJ
    Proc Eye Track Res Appl Symp; 2022 Jun; 2022():. PubMed ID: 36812105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Automated quality control of ultrasound based on in-air reverberation patterns.
    van Horssen P; Schilham A; Dickerscheid D; van der Werf N; Keijzers H; van Almere R; Kuijer J; Peters R; Hofman M
    Ultrasound; 2017 Nov; 25(4):229-238. PubMed ID: 29163659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. [About quality of diagnostic ultrasound - an enduring problem between reality and satire].
    Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2003 Dec; 24(6):375-6. PubMed ID: 14658078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Skeletal Defect at Mid-Trimester Ultrasound Scan.
    Brandão P; Soares E; Estevinho C; Freixo M; Portela-Carvalho AS; Ferreira MJ
    J Med Ultrasound; 2018; 26(2):115-117. PubMed ID: 30065534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Skeletal Defect at Mid-trimester Ultrasound Scan.
    Brandão P; Soares E; Estevinho C; Freixo M; Portela-Carvalho AS; Ferreira MJ
    J Med Ultrasound; 2018; 26(3):171-173. PubMed ID: 30283209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Cornstarch gel found to be an alternative for ultrasound use.
    Emerg Nurse; 2017 May; 25(2):12. PubMed ID: 28494675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Safety of routine ultrasound.
    ter Haar GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 2(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 12796945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Routine obstetric ultrasound.
    Romero R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 3(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 12797251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
    Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Does matrix transducer technology improve quality and repeatability of four-dimensional tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and mitral annular plane systolic excursion measurements?
    Thomas S; Erenbourg A; Chang M; Ferreira AGMT; Stevenson G; Welsh A
    Ultrasound; 2024 May; 32(2):103-113. PubMed ID: 38694827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Autonomous fetal morphology scan: deep learning + clustering merger - the second pair of eyes behind the doctor.
    Belciug S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Apr; 24(1):102. PubMed ID: 38641580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection in fetal morphology using Deep Learning and Statistical learning (PARADISE): protocol for the development of an intelligent decision support system using fetal morphology ultrasound scan to detect fetal congenital anomaly detection.
    Belciug S; Ivanescu RC; Serbanescu MS; Ispas F; Nagy R; Comanescu CM; Istrate-Ofiteru A; Iliescu DG
    BMJ Open; 2024 Feb; 14(2):e077366. PubMed ID: 38365300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.