These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18646990)

  • 1. Temporal order discrimination of tonal sequences by younger and older adults: the role of duration and rate.
    Shrivastav MN; Humes LE; Aylsworth L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):462-71. PubMed ID: 18646990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age-related differences in discrimination of temporal intervals in accented tone sequences.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):41-7. PubMed ID: 19931608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of age and sequence presentation rate on temporal order recognition.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S; Friedman SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):991-9. PubMed ID: 16938986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age effects in discrimination of repeating sequence intervals.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1490-500. PubMed ID: 21428513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age effects in discrimination of intervals within rhythmic tone sequences.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):388-96. PubMed ID: 25618068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3140-5. PubMed ID: 8550939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory temporal order perception in younger and older adults.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Oct; 41(5):1052-60. PubMed ID: 9771628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limits of auditory patterns discrimination for patterns with various durations and numbers of components.
    Watson CS; Foyle DC; Kidd GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2631-8. PubMed ID: 2283436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related differences in discrimination of an interval separating onsets of successive tone bursts as a function of interval duration.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S; Barrett J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):458-66. PubMed ID: 17614503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age effects in discrimination of intervals within accented tone sequences differing in accent type and sequence presentation rate.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3819. PubMed ID: 27908085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal discrimination for single components of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Espinoza-Varas B; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1685-94. PubMed ID: 3794075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Venezia JH; Martin AG; Hickok G; Richards VM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1051-1067. PubMed ID: 30986140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1975-87. PubMed ID: 19813809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Varying Reverberation on Music Perception for Young Normal-Hearing and Old Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216517750706. PubMed ID: 29320944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.