133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18647883)
1. Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee KH; Kim TJ; Mantiuk R; Kang HS; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W30-7. PubMed ID: 18647883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images.
Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Kim B; Seo J; Mantiuk R
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3218-26. PubMed ID: 19673221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall.
Kim TJ; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Chun EJ; Bajpai V; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 18194845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images.
Woo HS; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim YH; Lee KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 17715097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. JPEG2000 2D and 3D reversible compressions of thin-section chest CT images: improving compressibility by increasing data redundancy outside the body region.
Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kim B; Richter T; Yun ID; Lee SU; Bae KT; Shim H
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):271-7. PubMed ID: 21325033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses.
Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy.
Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold.
Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim BH; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim HJ; Hahn S
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17119972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement.
Ko JP; Chang J; Bomsztyk E; Babb JS; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 16126923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three image comparison methods for the visual assessment of the image fidelity of compressed computed tomography images.
Kim B; Lee H; Kim KJ; Seo J; Park S; Shin YG; Kim SH; Lee KH
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):836-44. PubMed ID: 21452721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed CT images using DICOM header information.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Lee H; Choi H; Jeon JJ; Ahn JH; Lee KH
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6449-57. PubMed ID: 22149828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression.
Savcenko V; Erickson BJ; Palisson PM; Persons KR; Manduca A; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 9494474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
