These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18648494)

  • 1. Sample size and precision in NIH peer review.
    Kaplan D; Lacetera N; Kaplan C
    PLoS One; 2008 Jul; 3(7):e2761. PubMed ID: 18648494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomedical research funding. NIH uncovers racial disparity in grant awards.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):925-6. PubMed ID: 21852462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.
    Pier EL; Brauer M; Filut A; Kaatz A; Raclaw J; Nathan MJ; Ford CE; Carnes M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):2952-2957. PubMed ID: 29507248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomedical research. NIH plans new grants for innovative minds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Aug; 301(5635):902. PubMed ID: 12920271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research funding. NIH in the post-doubling era: realities and strategies.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5802):1088-90. PubMed ID: 17110557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why China needs an NIH.
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):679. PubMed ID: 15085093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific publishing. NIH's peer review stands up to scrutiny.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6233):384. PubMed ID: 25908803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH response to open letter.
    Fauci AS; Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5718):49. PubMed ID: 15802584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New happenings at the NIH.
    Kennedy DN
    Neuroinformatics; 2008; 6(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 18604608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes to NIH grant system may backfire.
    Karp PD; Sherlock G; Gerlt JA; Sim I; Paulsen I; Babbitt PC; Laderoute K; Hunter L; Sternberg P; Wooley J; Bourne PE
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5905):1187-8. PubMed ID: 19023064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomedical research funding. A minority viewpoint.
    Price M
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):926. PubMed ID: 21852463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomedical research. Stimulus funding elicits a tidal wave of 'challenge grants'.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):867. PubMed ID: 19443754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.