These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18649492)

  • 1. Strategies in the information search process: interaction among task structure, knowledge, and source.
    Sacchi S; Burigo M
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):252-70. PubMed ID: 18649492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making.
    Richter T; Späth P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 16478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dynamic context model of interactive behavior.
    Fu WT
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 35(5):874-904. PubMed ID: 21736603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: a research review.
    Feigenson N; Park J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 16786404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks.
    Ryan LJ; Fritz MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1468-82. PubMed ID: 18085957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Confirmatory information search in simultaneous vs. sequential information presentation].
    Jonas E; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 11486641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment.
    Letzring TD; Wells SM; Funder DC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):111-23. PubMed ID: 16834483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Villa D; Morita SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Giving advice or making decisions in someone else's place: the influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information.
    Jonas E; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jul; 31(7):977-90. PubMed ID: 15951368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. You don't have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information.
    Richter T; Schroeder S; Wöhrmann B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):538-58. PubMed ID: 19254102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.
    Huber O; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 17603987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judging nursing information on the WWW: a theoretical understanding.
    Cader R; Campbell S; Watson D
    J Adv Nurs; 2009 Sep; 65(9):1916-25. PubMed ID: 19694855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rational learning and information sampling: on the "naivety" assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases.
    Le Mens G; Denrell J
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):379-92. PubMed ID: 21480741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.
    Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.
    Glöckner A; Betsch T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1055-75. PubMed ID: 18763891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resolution of conflicts between internal and external information sources on a time reproduction task: the role of perceived information reliability and attributional style.
    Ryan LJ; Henry K; Robey T; Edwards JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Oct; 117(2):205-29. PubMed ID: 15464014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sadder but wiser or happier and smarter? A demonstration of judgment and decision making.
    Chuang SC
    J Psychol; 2007 Jan; 141(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 17312687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.