These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18649494)

  • 1. Science versus the stars: a double-blind test of the validity of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and computer-generated astrological natal charts.
    Wyman AJ; Vyse S
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 18649494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A five-factor model perspective on psychopathy and comorbid Axis-II disorders in a forensic-psychiatric sample.
    Decuyper M; De Fruyt F; Buschman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 18790537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Personality assessment with the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory: the 30-Item-Short-Version (NEO-FFI-30)].
    Körner A; Geyer M; Roth M; Drapeau M; Schmutzer G; Albani C; Schumann S; Brähler E
    Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol; 2008 Jun; 58(6):238-45. PubMed ID: 17899495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Typical intellectual engagement, Big Five personality traits, approaches to learning and cognitive ability predictors of academic performance.
    Furnham A; Monsen J; Ahmetoglu G
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2009 Dec; 79(Pt 4):769-82. PubMed ID: 19245744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Swedish version of the NEO-PI-R: correlations between self-reports and college peer ratings.
    Westerlund J; Hansen N
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):815-24. PubMed ID: 20099543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study.
    Aluja A; García LF; Cuevas L; García O
    J Pers Disord; 2007 Feb; 21(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 17373890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychopathy and the Five-factor model of personality: a replication and extension.
    Miller JD; Lynam DR
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Oct; 81(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 12946923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R.
    Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personality organization, five-factor model, and mental health.
    Laverdière O; Gamache D; Diguer L; Hébert E; Larochelle S; Descôteaux J
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2007 Oct; 195(10):819-29. PubMed ID: 18043522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factorial structure and internal consistency of the German TEMPS-A scale: validation against the NEO-FFI questionnaire.
    Blöink R; Brieger P; Akiskal HS; Marneros A
    J Affect Disord; 2005 Mar; 85(1-2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15780678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personality dimensions among women with an eating disorder: towards reconceptualizing DSM.
    Tasca GA; Demidenko N; Krysanski V; Bissada H; Illing V; Gick M; Weekes K; Balfour L
    Eur Eat Disord Rev; 2009 Jul; 17(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 19421961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised in a clinical population.
    Ballenger JF; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11433800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Belief in astrology inventory: development and validation.
    Chico E; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Dec; 99(3):851-63. PubMed ID: 17305205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: a comparison with the MMPI-2.
    Morasco BJ; Gfeller JD; Elder KA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Jun; 88(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17518549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-sectional age differences in personality among medicare patients aged 65 to 100.
    Weiss A; Costa PT; Karuza J; Duberstein PR; Friedman B; McCrae RR
    Psychol Aging; 2005 Mar; 20(1):182-5. PubMed ID: 15769223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural validation of the revised Temperament and Character Inventory: Serbian data.
    Dzamonja-Ignjatovic T; Svrakic DM; Svrakic N; Jovanovic MD; Cloninger RC
    Compr Psychiatry; 2010; 51(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 20965312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R.
    Kurtz JE; Parrish CL
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):315-32. PubMed ID: 11393463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: a test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ.
    Gaughan ET; Miller JD; Pryor LR; Lynam DR
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):965-96. PubMed ID: 19558446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Apr; 70(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9697330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.