184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18650580)
21. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.
Manos MM; Kinney WK; Hurley LB; Sherman ME; Shieh-Ngai J; Kurman RJ; Ransley JE; Fetterman BJ; Hartinger JS; McIntosh KM; Pawlick GF; Hiatt RA
JAMA; 1999 May; 281(17):1605-10. PubMed ID: 10235153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Tabnak F; Tudury AJ; Stoodt G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15048955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
Moniak CW; Kutzner S; Adam E; Harden J; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 2000 Apr; 45(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 10804483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Cervical cytologic reports of ASCUS and LSIL. Cyto-histological correlation and implication for management].
Fallani MG; Penna C; Fambrini M; Marchionni M
Minerva Ginecol; 2002 Jun; 54(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 12063442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.
Verguts J; Bronselaer B; Donders G; Arbyn M; Van Eldere J; Drijkoningen M; Poppe W
BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1303-7. PubMed ID: 16978225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for cervical cancer in high-risk populations: DNA pap test or Hybrid Capture II test alone?
Miranda Pereira SM; Castelo A; Makabe S; Utagawa ML; Di Loreto C; Sakamoto Maeda MY; Marques JA; Santoro CL; Filho AL; Das Dores GB
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2006 Jan; 25(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16306782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improved abnormal Pap smear triage using cervical cancer biomarkers.
Killeen JL; Dye T; Grace C; Hiraoka M
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Jan; 18(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23760145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical results of a split sample liquid-based cytology (ThinPrep) study of 4,322 patients in a Turkish institution.
Tuncer ZS; Başaran M; Sezgin Y; Firat P; Mocan Kuzey G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2005; 26(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 16398228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies.
Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pap smear accuracy for the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions.
Nkwabong E; Laure Bessi Badjan I; Sando Z
Trop Doct; 2019 Jan; 49(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 30222058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Factors associated with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women].
Fan L; Zou LY; Wu YM; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 45(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20420780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abnormal Pap smears: a comparison of total abdominal hysterectomy and cone biopsy in management.
Onah HE; Iyoke CA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jan; 26(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 16390711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand.
Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study between Pap smear and visual inspection using acetic acid as a method of cervical cancer screening.
Begum SA; Rashid MH; Nessa A; Aziz MA; Zakaria SM; Roy JS
Mymensingh Med J; 2012 Jan; 21(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 22314471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
