These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18650693)

  • 1. Adjudicative competence.
    Dawes SE; Palmer BW; Jeste DV
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2008 Sep; 21(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 18650693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ten year research update (2001-2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
    Fogel MH; Schiffman W; Mumley D; Tillbrook C; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):165-91. PubMed ID: 23348511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preadolescent adjudicative competence: methodological considerations and recommendations for practice standards.
    Oberlander LB; Goldstein NE; Ho CN
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):545-63. PubMed ID: 11568960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five year research update (1996-2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
    Mumley DL; Tillbrook CE; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):329-50. PubMed ID: 12808694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On being 'too crazy' to sign into a mental hospital: the issue of consent to psychiatric hospitalization.
    Hoge SK
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):431-50. PubMed ID: 7841515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of clinical judgment of patients' competency to give informed consent: a case vignette study.
    Kitamura T; Kitamura F
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2000 Apr; 54(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 10803822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics and professional medical opinion and Guardianship and Administration legislation.
    Myers J
    Intern Med J; 2006 Aug; 36(8):540-1. PubMed ID: 16866667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Informed consent and patient competence in the psychically ill. A review of empirical studies].
    Bauer A; Vollmann J
    Nervenarzt; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1031-8. PubMed ID: 12430044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of legal capacity and testamentary capacity].
    Dreßing H; Foerster K; Leygraf J; Schneider F
    Nervenarzt; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1441-50; quiz 1451-2. PubMed ID: 25256794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Juvenile offenders: competence to stand trial.
    Soulier M
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 23107566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
    Scott CL
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competency to waive Miranda rights: clinical and legal issues.
    Frumkin IB
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2000; 24(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 10870355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Depression in jailed women defendants and its relationship to their adjudicative competence.
    Redding RE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 9148887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The US Supreme Court looks at voluntariness and consent.
    Miller RD
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 7995684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.
    Soliman S; Resnick PJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):614-29. PubMed ID: 20687120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic telepsychiatry: a possible solution for South Africa?
    Mars M; Ramlall S; Kaliski S
    Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg); 2012 Jul; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 22829226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defendant's or convict's competency to stand trial - forensic psychiatric evaluation.
    Cynkier PN
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(3):214-225. PubMed ID: 29460611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.