These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18651164)
1. Modelling stereokinetic phenomena by a minimum relative motion assumption: the tilted disk, the ellipsoid and the tilted bar. Beghi L; Xausa E; Zanforlin M Biol Cybern; 2008 Aug; 99(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 18651164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative determination of the three-dimensional appearances of a rotating ellipse without a rigidity assumption. Beghi L; Xausa E; De Biasio C; Zanforlin M Biol Cybern; 1991; 65(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 1958729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the principle of minimal relative motion--the bar, the circle with a dot, and the ellipse. Liu Z J Vis; 2003; 3(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 14640886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytic determination of the depth effect in stereokinetic phenomena without a rigidity assumption. Beghi L; Xausa E; Zanforlin M Biol Cybern; 1991; 65(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 1958728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The perceived motion of a stereokinetic stimulus. Rokers B; Yuille A; Liu Z Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(15):2375-87. PubMed ID: 16540141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A preference for minimal deformation constrains the perceived depth of a stereokinetic stimulus. Xing Y; Liu Z Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():53-59. PubMed ID: 30248368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereokinesis with moving visual phantoms. Bressan P; Vallortigara G Perception; 1987; 16(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 3671043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereokinetic effects with sharp and fuzzy illusory contours. Masini R; Ferraro M; Costa T Perception; 1994; 23(12):1437-45. PubMed ID: 7792133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion parallax contribution to perception of self-motion and depth. Hanes DA; Keller J; McCollum G Biol Cybern; 2008 Apr; 98(4):273-93. PubMed ID: 18365242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phenomenology and neurophysiological correlations: two approaches to perception research. Spillmann L Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1507-21. PubMed ID: 19303897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wobble cones and wobble holes: the stereokinetic effect revisited. Wilson JA; Robinson JO; Piggins DJ Perception; 1983; 12(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 6657425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binocular processing of motion: some unresolved questions. Regan D; Gray R Spat Vis; 2009; 22(1):1-43. PubMed ID: 19055886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A counterexample to the rigidity assumption in the visual perception of structure from motion. Braunstein ML; Andersen GJ Perception; 1984; 13(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 6504681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Form and movement in stereokinetic cycloids: motion lost and found. Wilson JA; Robinson JO Perception; 2000; 29(7):843-51. PubMed ID: 11064805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple 3-D interpretations in a classic stereokinetic effect. Bressan P; Vallortigara G Perception; 1986; 15(4):405-8. PubMed ID: 3822725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Domestic chicks perceive stereokinetic illusions. Clara E; Regolin L; Zanforlin M; Vallortigara G Perception; 2006; 35(7):983-92. PubMed ID: 16970206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]