These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18651286)

  • 1. Practical issues in the application of occlusion to measure visual demands imposed on drivers by in-vehicle tasks.
    Brook-Carter N; Stevens A; Reed N; Thompson S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 18651286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of in-vehicle HMI using occlusion techniques: experimental results and practical implications.
    Baumann M; Keinath A; Krems JF; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 15145282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19285580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction from multiple in-vehicle secondary tasks: vehicle performance and mental workload implications.
    Lansdown TC; Brook-Carter N; Kersloot T
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jan; 47(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 14660220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems.
    Liu YC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Mar; 44(4):425-42. PubMed ID: 11291824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver-initiated distractions: examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Jan; 41(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19114145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task.
    Ma R; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of the lane change test as a measure of in-vehicle system demand.
    Young KL; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):611-8. PubMed ID: 20828672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the reliability of the occlusion technique as a tool for the assessment of the HMI of in-vehicle information and communication systems.
    Gelau C; Henning MJ; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 18550026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance.
    Blanco M; Biever WJ; Gallagher JP; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):895-906. PubMed ID: 16584702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task.
    Leung S; Starmer G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Nov; 37(6):1056-65. PubMed ID: 16036208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of simulated cataracts on drivers' hazard perception ability.
    Marrington SA; Horswill MS; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1121-7. PubMed ID: 19050466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing assumptions implicit in the use of the 15-second rule as an early predictor of whether an in-vehicle device produces unacceptable levels of distraction.
    Reed-Jones J; Trick LM; Matthews M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):628-34. PubMed ID: 18329415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shifting attention across near and far spaces: implications for the use of hands-free cell phones while driving.
    Ferlazzo F; Fagioli S; Di Nocera F; Sdoia S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1859-64. PubMed ID: 19068287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skill acquisition while operating in-vehicle information systems: interface design determines the level of safety-relevant distractions.
    Jahn G; Krems JF; Gelau C
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):136-51. PubMed ID: 19653479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.
    Beede KE; Kass SJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 16310750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of driver training on simulated driving performance.
    Dorn L; Barker D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Jan; 37(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 15607276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.