These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18651383)

  • 1. The influence of permanent cardiac pacing on plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Sadowski M; Wozakowska-Kapłon B
    Cardiol J; 2008; 15(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 18651383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony determines abnormal heightening of plasma N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide level in symptomatic bradyarrhythmia patients with chronic dual-chamber vs. single-chamber atrial pacing.
    Lin JM; Lai LP; Tsai CT; Lin LC; Tseng CD; Lin JL
    Cardiology; 2008; 110(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 18057888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract septum pacing in the elderly with normal left ventricular ejection fraction: long-term follow-up.
    Zhang HX; Qian J; Hou FQ; Liu YN; Mao JH
    Kardiol Pol; 2012; 70(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 23180520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.
    Nielsen JC; Kristensen L; Andersen HR; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(4):614-23. PubMed ID: 12932590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain natriuretic peptide: a marker of cardiac dysfunction with ventricular or dual-chamber pacing.
    Kafkas N; Patsilinakos S; Makris K; Chlapoutakis G; Christou A; Dagadaki O; Babalis D
    Acta Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 66(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 22032052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical significance of preserving spontaneous QRS wave in the therapy of DDD pacing for sick sinus syndrome.
    Mani H; Shirayama T; Suzaki Y; Sakatani T; Sakamoto T; Yamamura M; Matsubara H; Taniwaki M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Sep; 27(9):1212-6. PubMed ID: 15461710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-chamber ventricular pacing increases markers of left ventricular dysfunction compared with dual-chamber pacing.
    Naegeli B; Kurz DJ; Koller D; Straumann E; Furrer M; Maurer D; Minder E; Bertel O
    Europace; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 17272326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes.
    Zhang YY; Wu DY; Fu NK; Lu FM; Xu J
    J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
    Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
    Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DDDR pacing results in left ventricular asynchrony with preservation of ejection fraction and NT-proBNP: a prospective study in sick sinus syndrome and normal ventricular function.
    Psychari SN; Apostolou TS; Iliodromitis EK; Charalampopoulos A; Kremastinos DT
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Oct; 144(2):310-2. PubMed ID: 19342110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison.
    Albertsen AE; Nielsen JC; Poulsen SH; Mortensen PT; Pedersen AK; Hansen PS; Jensen HK; Egeblad H
    Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 18192700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain natriuretic peptide predicts chronic atrial fibrillation after ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Horie H; Tsutamoto T; Minai K; Hayashi M; Kito O; Kinoshita M
    Jpn Circ J; 2000 Dec; 64(12):965-70. PubMed ID: 11194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of right ventricular apex pacing on the Tei index and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with a dual-chamber pacemaker.
    Ichiki H; Oketani N; Hamasaki S; Ishida S; Kataoka T; Ogawa M; Saihara K; Okui H; Fukudome T; Shinasato T; Kubozono T; Ninomiya Y; Matsushita T; Otsuji Y; Tei C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Sep; 29(9):985-90. PubMed ID: 16981923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber atrial or dual chamber pacing--effect of pacing mode and rate.
    Nielsen JC; Bøttcher M; Nielsen TT; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 May; 35(6):1453-61. PubMed ID: 10807447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing.
    Kato M; Dote K; Sasaki S; Goto K; Takemoto H; Habara S; Hasegawa D; Matsuda O
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep; 28(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 16176525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up.
    Kuniewicz M; Rydlewska A; Karkowski G; Lelakowska-Pieła M; Majewski J; Lelakowski J
    Kardiol Pol; 2015; 73(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 25001847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of left ventricular function in sick sinus syndrome on different long-term pacing modes.
    Mohan JC; Sethi KK; Arora R; Khalilullah M
    Indian Heart J; 1994; 46(6):303-6. PubMed ID: 7797215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.