These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18651896)

  • 1. Operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy.
    Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Strachan B
    BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1065; author reply 1066. PubMed ID: 18651896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.
    de Leeuw JW; de Wit C; Kuijken JP; Bruinse HW
    BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Episiotomy and assisted delivery: the end of the recommendations of the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians? A comment on the article, "Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery." BJOG 2008;115:104-8].
    Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Feb; 38(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19056187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.
    van Bavel J; Hukkelhoven CWPM; de Vries C; Papatsonis DNM; de Vogel J; Roovers JWR; Mol BW; de Leeuw JW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28721483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery.
    Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Strachan B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 May; 156(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 21277670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum.
    Kudish B; Blackwell S; Mcneeley SG; Bujold E; Kruger M; Hendrix SL; Sokol R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):749-54. PubMed ID: 16949408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.
    Andrews V; Sultan AH; Thakar R; Jones PW
    Birth; 2006 Jun; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 16732776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anal sphincter injury and episiotomy.
    Goer H
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):341-2. PubMed ID: 17150075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in vaginal births could be reduced].
    Räisänen S; Laine K; Jouhki MR; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Gissler M; Heinonen S
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 23155749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.
    Aukee P; Sundström H; Kairaluoma MV
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery.
    Ampt AJ; Patterson JA; Roberts CL; Ford JB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Dec; 131(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 26489488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perineal care.
    Kettle C
    Clin Evid; 2004 Jun; (11):1853-71. PubMed ID: 15652085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.
    Murphy DJ; Macleod M; Bahl R; Goyder K; Howarth L; Strachan B
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. PubMed ID: 19035944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: it's time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation.
    Farrell SA
    CMAJ; 2002 Feb; 166(3):337-8. PubMed ID: 11868644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing high-order perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery.
    Hirsch E; Haney EI; Gordon TE; Silver RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):668.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18395688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Episiotomy: navigating the evidence.
    Robinson JN
    BJOG; 2015 Jul; 122(8):1082. PubMed ID: 26105636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Wu JM; Williams KS; Hundley AF; Connolly A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 16098883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.
    de Vogel J; van der Leeuw-van Beek A; Gietelink D; Vujkovic M; de Leeuw JW; van Bavel J; Papatsonis D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):404.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22425401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.