207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18651908)
21. The changing face of Medicare peer review: quality improvement forms the key to better care.
Sotham J
Mo Med; 1996 Feb; 93(2):70-1. PubMed ID: 8820278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview.
Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Racette P; Sieber W
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 17986671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Accreditation and clinical indicators: experiences from Australia].
Pawsey M
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Mar; 162(12):1753-4. PubMed ID: 10766662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. External hematology quality assurance initiative in Asia. Asian Quality Assurance Survey (AQuAS)Program.
Lee KN; Yoon SY; Cho HI; Tatsumi N; Maramba T
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 15529428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Peer review. How it works for us.
Korsnes NJ
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1994; 76(6):36-8. PubMed ID: 9508929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. CLIA-88 final rule: Part 3.
Voldish K
N J Med; 1992 Nov; 89(11):847-8. PubMed ID: 1454237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of laboratory tests according to quality expectations.
Laleli Y
Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):307. PubMed ID: 19863934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Recent disciplinary committee rulings foster defensive medicine].
van Weel C
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(33):1854-5. PubMed ID: 9856164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. GP peer appraisal in Scotland: an ongoing and developing exercise in quality.
Law S; Haman H; Cameron N; Staples I
Educ Prim Care; 2009 Mar; 20(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19519993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proficiency testing: planning for the future.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):124-5. PubMed ID: 15830400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Hematology external quality assessment in Europe.
Jou JM; Gutierrez G; Reverter JC;
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(3):151-2. PubMed ID: 15529427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Algorithm and procedure for quality assurance by using patient data in routine laboratory].
Kuwa K
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Nov; 62 Suppl 11():26-9. PubMed ID: 15628338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Quality management in cardiac surgery in the USA].
Loebe M; Tewani S; Bruckner BA; Disbot M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134 Suppl 6():S234-6. PubMed ID: 19834853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Public policy recommendations for oversight of molecular laboratory tests.
Gulley ML
N C Med J; 2007; 68(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 17566555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Quality Assurance in Sociomedical Evaluation by Peer Review: A Pilot Project of the German Statutory Pension Insurance].
Strahl A; Gerlich C; Wolf HD; Gehrke J; Müller-Garnn A; Vogel H
Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Mar; 78(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 25531159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Significance and future prospects of the ISO15189 accreditation topics on systems of operation in preparation for accreditation].
Ohno H
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Jan; 58(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 20169947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How to chart for peer review.
Raymond L
RN; 2001 Jun; 64(6):67-70. PubMed ID: 12032935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting the risk of failure in proficiency testing.
Rhoads DG
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Mar; 26(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 10172148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Pathology Laboratory Act 2007 explained.
Looi LM
Malays J Pathol; 2008 Jun; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19108405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The technologist's role in quality management of off-site testing. Part III.
Belsey R; Baer DM
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1987 Nov; 19(11):41-4, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10318066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
