BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18651981)

  • 41. Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials.
    Gillies K; Elwyn G; Cook J
    Trials; 2014 Jul; 15():307. PubMed ID: 25073967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Informed consent documents do not encourage good-quality decision making.
    Brehaut JC; Carroll K; Elwyn G; Saginur R; Kimmelman J; Shojania K; Syrowatka A; Nguyen T; Hoe E; Fergusson D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):708-24. PubMed ID: 22537428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Patient-Centered Approach to Informed Consent: Results from a Survey and Randomized Trial.
    Krishnamurti T; Argo N
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):726-40. PubMed ID: 26964877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Preparing accessible and understandable clinical research participant information leaflets and consent forms: a set of guidelines from an expert consensus conference.
    Coleman E; O'Sullivan L; Crowley R; Hanbidge M; Driver S; Kroll T; Kelly A; Nichol A; McCarthy O; Sukumar P; Doran P
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 May; 7(1):31. PubMed ID: 34006326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
    Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving patient informed consent for haemophilia gene therapy: the case for change.
    Woollard L; Gorman R; Rosenfelt DJ
    Ther Adv Rare Dis; 2021; 2():26330040211047244. PubMed ID: 37181114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Identifying components in consent information needed to support informed decision making about trial participation: An interview study with women managing cancer.
    Abhyankar P; Velikova G; Summers B; Bekker HL
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Jul; 161():83-91. PubMed ID: 27261532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The mediating effect of shared decision-making in enhancing patient satisfaction with participation in cancer clinical trials.
    Chang WW; Wu MT; Chang YC; Hu WY
    Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs; 2023 Aug; 10(8):100265. PubMed ID: 37519403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Importance of decisional capacity tools in obtaining informed consent in clinical settings.
    Radenković M
    Bioethics; 2023 Feb; 37(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 36426407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research.
    Sugarman J; McCrory DC; Hubal RC
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Apr; 46(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 9560079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based Workplace Disability Disclosure Decision Aid Tool for Autistic Youth and Young Adults: Qualitative Co-design Study.
    Tomas V; Hsu S; Kingsnorth S; Anagnostou E; Kirsh B; Lindsay S
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Apr; 7():e44354. PubMed ID: 37104002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for patients with generalised anxiety disorder: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Perestelo-Pérez L; Rivero-Santana A; Ramos-García V; Álvarez-Pérez Y; Duarte-Díaz A; Torres-Castaño A; Trujillo-Martín MDM; Del Pino-Sedeño T; González-González AI; Serrano-Aguilar P
    BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e039956. PubMed ID: 33303445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Reder M; Kolip P
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26198675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters.
    Heen AF; Vandvik PO; Brandt L; Achille F; Guyatt GH; Akl EA; Treewek S; Agoritsas T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jun; 21(1):202. PubMed ID: 34187484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development and evaluation of decision aids for people considering taking part in a clinical trial: a conceptual framework.
    Gillies K; Campbell MK
    Trials; 2019 Jul; 20(1):401. PubMed ID: 31277693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.
    Kinnersley P; Phillips K; Savage K; Kelly MJ; Farrell E; Morgan B; Whistance R; Lewis V; Mann MK; Stephens BL; Blazeby J; Elwyn G; Edwards AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD009445. PubMed ID: 23832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improving treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder: a phase II randomised controlled trial of an online patient decision-aid.
    Fisher A; Keast R; Costa D; Sharpe L; Manicavasagar V; Anderson J; Juraskova I
    BMC Psychiatry; 2020 Sep; 20(1):447. PubMed ID: 32943031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.