2414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18652085)
21. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study.
Gualini F; Gualini G; Cominelli R; Lekholm U
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 18783416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10635187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 19146055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption.
Jemt T; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 7615326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.
Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles.
Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading.
Glauser R; Zembic A; Ruhstaller P; Windisch S
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S59-68. PubMed ID: 17618935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fixed partial dentures supported by natural teeth and Brånemark system implants: a 3-year report.
Tangerud T; Grønningsaeter AG; Taylor A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 11958403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19397637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients.
Carlsson GE; Lindquist LW; Jemt T
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 11203645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
Ortorp A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Report of a case receiving full-arch rehabilitation in both jaws using immediate implant loading protocols: a 1-year resonance frequency analysis follow-up.
Portmann M; Glauser R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 16681490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Tumer C; Yenigul M; Avci M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 16958688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Early functional loading of conical Brånemark implants in the edentulous mandible: a 12-month follow-up clinical report.
Kronström M; Widbom T; Löfquist LE; Henningson C; Widbom C; Lundberg T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 12690343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
