872 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18652712)
1. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study.
Chan JS; Segara D; Nair P
Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Dec; 8(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 17227267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient?
Boldt J; Menges T; Wollbrück M; Hammermann H; Hempelmann G
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1913-8. PubMed ID: 7988126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.
Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Wong LS; Yong BH; Young KK; Lau LS; Cheng KL; Man JS; Irwin MG
Liver Transpl; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 18581504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review article: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound.
Meyer S; Todd D; Wright I; Gortner L; Reynolds G
Emerg Med Australas; 2008 Jun; 20(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 18400002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by continuous wave Doppler in air rescue service].
Knobloch K; Hubrich V; Rohmann P; Lüpkemann M; Phillips R; Gerich T; Krettek C
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2005 Dec; 40(12):750-5. PubMed ID: 16362876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring--the Baxter/Edwards Critical-Care Swan Ganz IntelliCath and Viligance system.
Munro HM; Wood CE; Taylor BL; Smith GB
Clin Intensive Care; 1994; 5(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10147254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive cardiac output determination using applanation tonometry-derived radial artery pulse contour analysis in critically ill patients.
Compton F; Wittrock M; Schaefer JH; Zidek W; Tepel M; Scholze A
Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):171-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
de Waal EE; Kalkman CJ; Rex S; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1904-9. PubMed ID: 17581493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
Breukers RB; Jansen JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a partial CO2 rebreathing technique for cardiac output monitoring in critically ill patients.
Odenstedt H; Stenqvist O; Lundin S
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2002 Feb; 46(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 11942862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a new semi-continuous cardiac output system in the intensive care unit.
Seguin P; Colcanap O; Le Rouzo A; Tanguy M; Guillou YM; Mallédant Y
Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9669016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: validation of a partial carbon dioxide rebreathing (NICO) system in comparison with continuous thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter].
Jover JL; Soro M; Belda FJ; Aguilar G; Caro P; Ferrandis R
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005 May; 52(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 15968903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Orme RM; Pigott DW; Mihm FG
Anaesthesia; 2004 Jun; 59(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15144300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter.
Gueret G; Kiss G; Rossignol B; Bezon E; Wargnier JP; Miossec A; Corre O; Arvieux CC
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 16953944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution].
Leone D; Servillo G; De Robertis E; Rossano F; Tufano R
Minerva Anestesiol; 1998; 64(7-8):351-6. PubMed ID: 9796245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
