These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

869 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18652712)

  • 1. Clinical validation of the non-invasive cardiac output monitor USCOM-1A in critically ill patients.
    van Lelyveld-Haas LE; van Zanten AR; Borm GF; Tjan DH
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):917-24. PubMed ID: 18652712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
    Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study.
    Chan JS; Segara D; Nair P
    Crit Care Resusc; 2006 Dec; 8(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 17227267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit.
    Tan HL; Pinder M; Parsons R; Roberts B; van Heerden PV
    Br J Anaesth; 2005 Mar; 94(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 15653709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
    Wong LS; Yong BH; Young KK; Lau LS; Cheng KL; Man JS; Irwin MG
    Liver Transpl; 2008 Jul; 14(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 18581504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review article: Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound.
    Meyer S; Todd D; Wright I; Gortner L; Reynolds G
    Emerg Med Australas; 2008 Jun; 20(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 18400002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by continuous wave Doppler in air rescue service].
    Knobloch K; Hubrich V; Rohmann P; Lüpkemann M; Phillips R; Gerich T; Krettek C
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2005 Dec; 40(12):750-5. PubMed ID: 16362876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous invasive cardiac output monitoring--the Baxter/Edwards Critical-Care Swan Ganz IntelliCath and Viligance system.
    Munro HM; Wood CE; Taylor BL; Smith GB
    Clin Intensive Care; 1994; 5(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10147254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive cardiac output determination using applanation tonometry-derived radial artery pulse contour analysis in critically ill patients.
    Compton F; Wittrock M; Schaefer JH; Zidek W; Tepel M; Scholze A
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):171-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    de Waal EE; Kalkman CJ; Rex S; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Aug; 35(8):1904-9. PubMed ID: 17581493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
    Breukers RB; Jansen JR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a partial CO2 rebreathing technique for cardiac output monitoring in critically ill patients.
    Odenstedt H; Stenqvist O; Lundin S
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2002 Feb; 46(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 11942862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new semi-continuous cardiac output system in the intensive care unit.
    Seguin P; Colcanap O; Le Rouzo A; Tanguy M; Guillou YM; Mallédant Y
    Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9669016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the clinical utility of an ultrasonic monitor of cardiac output (the USCOM) and agreement with thermodilution measurement.
    Boyle M; Steel L; Flynn GM; Murgo M; Nicholson L; O'Brien M; Bihari D
    Crit Care Resusc; 2009 Sep; 11(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19737122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Measurement of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: validation of a partial carbon dioxide rebreathing (NICO) system in comparison with continuous thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter].
    Jover JL; Soro M; Belda FJ; Aguilar G; Caro P; Ferrandis R
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005 May; 52(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 15968903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution.
    Orme RM; Pigott DW; Mihm FG
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Jun; 59(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15144300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter.
    Gueret G; Kiss G; Rossignol B; Bezon E; Wargnier JP; Miossec A; Corre O; Arvieux CC
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 16953944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution].
    Leone D; Servillo G; De Robertis E; Rossano F; Tufano R
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1998; 64(7-8):351-6. PubMed ID: 9796245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device.
    Mets B; Frumento RJ; Bennett-Guerrero E; Naka Y
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Dec; 16(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 12486654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.