281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18652812)
1. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological deficits in diagnostic research using '-omics' technologies: evaluation of the QUADOMICS tool and quality of recently published studies.
Parker LA; Gómez Saez N; Lumbreras B; Porta M; Hernández-Aguado I
PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11419. PubMed ID: 20625481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multivariable adjustments counteract spectrum and test review bias in accuracy studies.
Bachmann LM; ter Riet G; Weber WE; Kessels AG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):357-361.e2. PubMed ID: 18620840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
Bailey B; Amre DK
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 14515428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
Kleijnen J
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Research on diagnostic tests in Medicina Clinica. A methodological assessment].
Ramos Rincón JM; Hernández Aguado I
Med Clin (Barc); 1998 Jul; 111(4):129-34. PubMed ID: 9717144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):357-63. PubMed ID: 12880535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool.
Wade R; Corbett M; Eastwood A
Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26053845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of peripheral joints: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI.
Miller E; Roposch A; Uleryk E; Doria AS
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):739-57. PubMed ID: 19427982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG;
Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):639-50. PubMed ID: 14515429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)].
Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M
Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological quality and outcomes of studies addressing manual cervical spine examinations: a review.
Hollerwöger D
Man Ther; 2006 May; 11(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 16483829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Omics-bioinformatics in the context of clinical data.
Mayer G; Heinze G; Mischak H; Hellemons ME; Heerspink HJ; Bakker SJ; de Zeeuw D; Haiduk M; Rossing P; Oberbauer R
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 719():479-97. PubMed ID: 21370098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of error and its control in studies on the diagnostic accuracy of "-omics" technologies.
Lumbreras B; Porta M; Marquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
Proteomics Clin Appl; 2009 Feb; 3(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 26238617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
