330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18653928)
1. Modelling the interaction of electromagnetic fields (10 MHz-10 GHz) with the human body: methods and applications.
Hand JW
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):R243-86. PubMed ID: 18653928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exposure of biological material to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: dosimetric implications.
Simicevic N
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 17495658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FDTD calculations of specific energy absorption rate in a seated voxel model of the human body from 10 MHz to 3 GHz.
Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2339-52. PubMed ID: 16625046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
Jokela K
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resonance behaviour of whole-body averaged specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in the female voxel model, NAOMI.
Dimbylow P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4053-63. PubMed ID: 16177529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets.
; Trakic A; Wang H; Liu F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1261-77. PubMed ID: 17969138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the female voxel phantom, NAOMI, and its application to calculations of induced current densities and electric fields from applied low frequency magnetic and electric fields.
Dimbylow P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1047-70. PubMed ID: 15798308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric analysis of the carousel setup for the exposure of rats at 1.62 GHz.
Schönborn F; Poković K; Kuster N
Bioelectromagnetics; 2004 Jan; 25(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 14696049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
Silny J
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FDTD calculation of whole-body average SAR in adult and child models for frequencies from 30 MHz to 3 GHz.
Wang J; Fujiwara O; Kodera S; Watanabe S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4119-27. PubMed ID: 16912372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of electromagnetic polarization on the whole-body averaged SAR in children for plane-wave exposures.
Hirata A; Ito N; Fujiwara O
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):N59-65. PubMed ID: 19141885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the z-transform to investigate nanopulse penetration of biological matter.
Su S; Dai W; Haynie DT; Simicevic N
Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Jul; 26(5):389-97. PubMed ID: 15931682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HPA-RPD advice on practical implementation of EMF exposure guidelines.
Swanson J
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Jun; 25(2):212. PubMed ID: 16060004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dominant factors influencing whole-body average SAR due to far-field exposure in whole-body resonance frequency and GHz regions.
Hirata A; Kodera S; Wang J; Fujiwara O
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep; 28(6):484-7. PubMed ID: 17486582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculated SAR distributions in a human voxel phantom due to the reflection of electromagnetic fields from a ground plane between 65 MHz and 2 GHz.
Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2277-89. PubMed ID: 18401062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
Christ A
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
Heinrich H
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric assessment of simultaneous exposure to elf electric and magnetic fields.
Leitgeb N; Cech R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):671-4. PubMed ID: 18270003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
