These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18654275)
1. What have we learned from public engagement? Jones R Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 May; 2(5):262-3. PubMed ID: 18654275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reflecting on public engagement and science policy. Jones RA Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24434708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rules of engagement. Toumey C Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 Jul; 2(7):386-7. PubMed ID: 18654314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Building the capacity for public engagement with science in the United States. Guston DH Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24434713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods. Gehrke PJ Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The GM public debate: context and communication strategies. Hails R; Kinderlerer J Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):819-25. PubMed ID: 14526377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China. Jia H; Liu L Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 24434709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A word from the Editor on the special issue on 'Public Engagement'. Bauer MW Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 24434704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A little knowledge. Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 Dec; 2(12):731. PubMed ID: 18654415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Haywood BK; Besley JC Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):92-106. PubMed ID: 23887249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Scheufele DA; Corley EA; Dunwoody S; Shih TJ; Hillback E; Guston DH Nat Nanotechnol; 2007 Dec; 2(12):732-4. PubMed ID: 18654416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science and democracy. Toumey C Nat Nanotechnol; 2006 Oct; 1(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 18654127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Health lobby cranks up its postage meter. Kosterlitz J Natl J (Wash); 1993 Oct; 25(42):2486-8. PubMed ID: 10131657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. On the limits of public engagement for the governance of emerging technologies. Sturgis P Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 24434710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Why should we promote public engagement with science? Stilgoe J; Lock SJ; Wilsdon J Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 24434705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies. Kyle R; Dodds S Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Mar; 15(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 18825510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experiments in engagement: Designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building. Selin C; Rawlings KC; de Ridder-Vignone K; Sadowski J; Altamirano Allende C; Gano G; Davies SR; Guston DH Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):634-649. PubMed ID: 26769749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public engagement and communication: who is in charge? Boëte C EMBO Rep; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 29247079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do public inquiries for noise control serve a useful purpose?--An acoustic consultant's view. Flindell IH Noise Health; 2003; 5(18):31-8. PubMed ID: 12631434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]