These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18654830)

  • 1. Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.
    Danielson-François AM; Zhou Y; Greenfield MD
    Genetica; 2009 May; 136(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 18654830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Zhou Y; Kuster HK; Pettis JS; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Greenfield MD
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1317-34. PubMed ID: 18346222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization.
    Danielson-François AM; Kelly JK; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):532-42. PubMed ID: 16599929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genotype × environment interaction, environmental heterogeneity and the lek paradox.
    Greenfield MD; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Harris BR; Zhou Y
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):601-13. PubMed ID: 22268693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction.
    Jia FY; Greenfield MD; Collins RD
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):953-67. PubMed ID: 10937268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18327650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song.
    Brandt LS; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 15271081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.
    Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signalling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: pyralidae).
    Collins RD; Jang Y; Reinhold K; Greenfield MD
    Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Dec; 83 ( Pt 6)():644-51. PubMed ID: 10651908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a Genomic Resource and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Male Calling Traits in the Lesser Wax Moth, Achroia grisella.
    Gleason JM; Zhou Y; Hackett JL; Harris BR; Greenfield MD
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147014. PubMed ID: 26807910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The potential of plant viruses to promote genotypic diversity via genotype x environment interactions.
    van Mölken T; Stuefer JF
    Ann Bot; 2011 Jun; 107(8):1391-7. PubMed ID: 21515605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of predation risk on mate signaling and mate choice in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella.
    Edomwande C; Barbosa F
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):524. PubMed ID: 31949273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.
    Li XY; Holman L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.
    Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
    Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaaq0369. PubMed ID: 29806021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Genetic Mapping and Genome Assembly in the Lesser Wax Moth
    Koseva BS; Hackett JL; Zhou Y; Harris BR; Kelly JK; Greenfield MD; Gleason JM; Macdonald SJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Jul; 9(7):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 31101652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.
    Plesnar-Bielak A; Skwierzyńska AM; Hlebowicz K; Radwan J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 29996775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative genetics of preference and performance on chickpeas in the noctuid moth, Helicoverpa armigera.
    Cotter SC; Edwards OR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2006 May; 96(5):396-402. PubMed ID: 16570068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.