These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18655333)

  • 1. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--part II.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 17(7):449-54; quiz 456. PubMed ID: 18655333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--Part I.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):313-8; quiz 320. PubMed ID: 16121747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Long-term clinical evaluation of 2 dental materials used for the preparation of esthetic inlays].
    Khairallah C; Hokayem A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Sep; 32(127):5-13. PubMed ID: 20441124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations.
    de Paula AB; Duque C; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 18666502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictable cementation of esthetic restorations: part II--selection criteria and guidelines for implementation.
    Quintas AF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 18038716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
    Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of prepolymerized composite megafiller on the marginal adaptation of composite restorations in cavities with different C-factors: an SEM study.
    Bhushan S; Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 21187613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of material selection on the risk of inlay fracture during pre-cementation functional occlusal tapping.
    Magne P; Paranhos MP; Schlichting LH
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20934744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite.
    Palasuk J; Platt JA; Cho SD; Levon JA; Brown DT; Hovijitra ST
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 22830537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral repair of cosmetic restorations.
    Denehy G; Bouschlicher M; Vargas M
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Oct; 42(4):719-37, x. PubMed ID: 9891653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision.
    Barghi N
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Aug; 21(8):659-62, 664; quiz 666. PubMed ID: 11199656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.