BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18655852)

  • 1. Attention to human speakers in a virtual auditory environment: brain potential evidence.
    Nager W; Dethlefsen C; Münte TF
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():164-70. PubMed ID: 18655852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological attention effects in a virtual cocktail-party setting.
    Münte TF; Spring DK; Szycik GR; Noesselt T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():78-88. PubMed ID: 19853586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateralized irrelevant speech alters visuospatial selective attention mechanisms.
    Schaefer M; Tewes U; Münte TF; Johannes S
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16188366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking the voluntary control of auditory spatial attention with event-related brain potentials.
    Störmer VS; Green JJ; McDonald JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 19170950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaural timing cues do not contribute to the map of space in the ferret superior colliculus: a virtual acoustic space study.
    Campbell RA; Doubell TP; Nodal FR; Schnupp JW; King AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):242-54. PubMed ID: 16162823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The effects of selective attention to tone pips and speech messages upon event-related potential (author's transl)].
    Honjoh Y; Okita T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1981 Apr; 52(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 7300048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical mechanisms of auditory spatial attention in a target detection task.
    Golob EJ; Holmes JL
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1384():128-39. PubMed ID: 21295017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotional salience changes the focus of spatial attention.
    Pauli WM; Röder B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():94-104. PubMed ID: 18466885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-dependent impairment of auditory processing under spatially focused and divided attention: an electrophysiological study.
    Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Jan; 83(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 19799963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity.
    Talsma D; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 17(7):1098-114. PubMed ID: 16102239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congenitally blind humans use different stimulus selection strategies in hearing: an ERP study of spatial and temporal attention.
    Röder B; Krämer UM; Lange K
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):311-22. PubMed ID: 17943008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The focus of attention at the virtual cocktail party--electrophysiological evidence.
    Lambrecht J; Spring DK; Münte TF
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Feb; 489(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 21130840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.