These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18655984)

  • 1. Optimizing measurement of subjective amplitude of accommodation with defocus curves.
    Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1329-38. PubMed ID: 18655984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is randomisation necessary for measuring defocus curves in pre-presbyopes?
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17448927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves.
    Wolffsohn JS; Jinabhai AN; Kingsnorth A; Sheppard AL; Naroo SA; Shah S; Buckhurst P; Hall LA; Young G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 23688874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective Evaluation of Defocus and Astigmatism Combinations Using Image Simulation in Presbyopes.
    Vincent M; Marin G; Legras R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jan; 98(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 33394934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for delayed presbyopia after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.
    Artola A; Patel S; Schimchak P; Ayala MJ; Ruiz-Moreno JM; Alió JL
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):735-41.e1. PubMed ID: 16650666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower sensitivity to peripheral hypermetropic defocus due to higher order ocular aberrations.
    Papadogiannis P; Romashchenko D; Unsbo P; Lundström L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 May; 40(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 32031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia.
    Anderson HA; Stuebing KK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 91(11):1290-301. PubMed ID: 25602235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens.
    Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T; Charman WN; Cerviño A; Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 18471630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Sultani K; Cossette C; Burr B
    J Optom; 2016; 9(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 26749188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Different Methods of Measuring Accommodative Amplitude with Hofstetter's Normative Values in a Ghanaian Population.
    Abu EK; Ocansey S; Yennu J; Asirifi I; Marfo R
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Sep; 43(9):1145-1150. PubMed ID: 29787692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic positional change and defocus curve of a phakic foldable anterior-chamber angle-supported intraocular lens during accommodation.
    Klaproth OK; Rehrmann J; Kohnen T
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Jul; 120(7):1373-9. PubMed ID: 23523163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accommodative Behavior of Young Eyes Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses.
    Altoaimi BH; Almutairi MS; Kollbaum PS; Bradley A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 May; 95(5):416-427. PubMed ID: 29683985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude of accommodation and its relation to refractive errors.
    Abraham LM; Kuriakose T; Sivanandam V; Venkatesan N; Thomas R; Muliyil J
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 53(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 15976465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different monovision contact lens powers on the visual function of emmetropic presbyopic patients (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
    Durrie DS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():366-401. PubMed ID: 17471352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular accommodation response to random defocus changes induced by a tuneable lens.
    Sharmin N; Vohnsen B
    Vision Res; 2019 Dec; 165():45-53. PubMed ID: 31634733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accommodation measurements in a prepresbyopic and presbyopic population.
    Ostrin LA; Glasser A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1435-44. PubMed ID: 15210220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Optical Defocus on Choroidal Thickness in Healthy Adults With Presbyopia.
    Chiang ST; Chen TL; Phillips JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Oct; 59(12):5188-5193. PubMed ID: 30372745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous Measurement of Objective and Subjective Accommodation in Response to Step Stimulation.
    Hirota M; Morimoto T; Miyoshi T; Fujikado T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 Nov; 61(13):38. PubMed ID: 33252633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of small aperture implants providing increased depth of focus in pseudophakic eyes.
    Eppig T; Spira C; Seitz B; Szentmáry N; Langenbucher A
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 27017516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.