405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656185)
1. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?
Nezhat C; Lavie O; Lemyre M; Unal E; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2620-2. PubMed ID: 18656185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
Advincula AP
Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary results at our Center].
Benincà G; Garrone C; Rebecchi F; Giaccone C; Morino M
Chir Ital; 2003; 55(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 12872566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.
Nezhat C; Lavie O; Hsu S; Watson J; Barnett O; Lemyre M
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 18377901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature.
Cho JE; Nezhat FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):669-81. PubMed ID: 19896593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
Chen CC; Falcone T
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
Advincula AP; Song A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new era in laparoscopic surgery. Evaluation of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures.
Khairy GA; Fouda M; Abdulkarim A; Al-Saigh A; Al-Kattan K
Saudi Med J; 2005 May; 26(5):777-80. PubMed ID: 15951869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective study comparing operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children.
Lehnert M; Richter B; Beyer PA; Heller K
J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Aug; 41(8):1392-6. PubMed ID: 16863843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted laparoscopic trachelectomy after supracervical hysterectomy.
Nezhat CH; Rogers JD
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):850.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18054926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
