401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656225)
21. Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and hormones through drinking water treatment.
Huerta-Fontela M; Galceran MT; Ventura F
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(3):1432-42. PubMed ID: 21122885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influences of solution chemistry and polymeric natural organic matter on the removal of aquatic pharmaceutical residuals by nanofiltration.
Zazouli MA; Susanto H; Nasseri S; Ulbricht M
Water Res; 2009 Jul; 43(13):3270-80. PubMed ID: 19520413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ozonation of reverse osmosis concentrate: kinetics and efficiency of beta blocker oxidation.
Benner J; Salhi E; Ternes T; von Gunten U
Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3003-12. PubMed ID: 18472125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pharmaceuticals and pesticides in reclaimed water: Efficiency assessment of a microfiltration-reverse osmosis (MF-RO) pilot plant.
Rodriguez-Mozaz S; Ricart M; Köck-Schulmeyer M; Guasch H; Bonnineau C; Proia L; de Alda ML; Sabater S; Barceló D
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Jan; 282():165-73. PubMed ID: 25269743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds and endocrine disrupting compounds by clean and fouled nanofiltration membranes.
Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2349-62. PubMed ID: 19303127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of household reverse-osmosis systems in a Western U.S. region with high arsenic in groundwater.
Walker M; Seiler RL; Meinert M
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(2-3):245-52. PubMed ID: 17919687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Priority organic micropollutants in water sources in Flanders and the Netherlands and assessment of removal possibilities with nanofiltration.
Verliefde A; Cornelissen E; Amy G; Van der Bruggen B; van Dijk H
Environ Pollut; 2007 Mar; 146(1):281-9. PubMed ID: 16965844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals by chlorination, coagulation-sedimentation and powdered activated carbon treatment.
Simazaki D; Fujiwara J; Manabe S; Matsuda M; Asami M; Kunikane S
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(5):1129-35. PubMed ID: 18824814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Removal of hormones and pharmaceuticals in the Advanced Water Recycling Demonstration Plant in Queensland, Australia.
Khan SJ; Wintgens T; Sherman P; Zaricky J; Schäfer AI
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):15-22. PubMed ID: 15497824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors affecting fluoride and natural organic matter (NOM) removal from natural waters in Tanzania by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis.
Shen J; Schäfer AI
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 527-528():520-9. PubMed ID: 26005995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Treatment of a landfill leachate containing compounds of pharmaceutical origin.
Matosić M; Terzić S; Korajlija Jakopović H; Mijatović I; Ahel M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 18725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recent progress in the applications of layer-by-layer assembly to the preparation of nanostructured ion-rejecting water purification membranes.
Sanyal O; Lee I
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2014 Mar; 14(3):2178-89. PubMed ID: 24745210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment of yellow water by membrane separations and advanced oxidation methods.
Lazarova Z; Spendlingwimmer R
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 18701795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
