These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656253)

  • 1. Can external quality control improve pig AI efficiency?
    Waberski D; Petrunkina AM; Töpfer-Petersen E
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1346-51. PubMed ID: 18656253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying useable semen.
    Foxcroft GR; Dyck MK; Ruiz-Sanchez A; Novak S; Dixon WT
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1324-36. PubMed ID: 18775561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine.
    Colenbrander B; Feitsma H; Grooten HJ
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():207-15. PubMed ID: 8145205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binding of boar spermatozoa to oviductal epithelium in vitro in relation to sperm morphology and storage time.
    Waberski D; Magnus F; Ardón F; Petrunkina AM; Weitze KF; Töpfer-Petersen E
    Reproduction; 2006 Feb; 131(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 16452724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility.
    Boe-Hansen GB; Christensen P; Vibjerg D; Nielsen MB; Hedeboe AM
    Theriogenology; 2008 Apr; 69(6):728-36. PubMed ID: 18242673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility.
    Gadea J
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):431-44. PubMed ID: 15626409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [In vitro assessment of semen for the prediction of fertility].
    Waberski D; Petrounkina A; Weitze KF; Töpfer-Petersen E
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere; 1999 Feb; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10077807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cryopreservation of boar semen and its future importance to the industry.
    Bailey JL; Lessard C; Jacques J; Brèque C; Dobrinski I; Zeng W; Galantino-Homer HL
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1251-9. PubMed ID: 18653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diseases in swine transmitted by artificial insemination: an overview.
    Maes D; Nauwynck H; Rijsselaere T; Mateusen B; Vyt P; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1337-45. PubMed ID: 18657310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1466-1479.e3. PubMed ID: 22289218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Field data analysis of boar semen quality.
    Broekhuijse ML; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Sep; 46 Suppl 2():59-63. PubMed ID: 21884280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality Control of Boar Sperm Processing: Implications from European AI Centres and Two Spermatology Reference Laboratories.
    Riesenbeck A; Schulze M; Rüdiger K; Henning H; Waberski D
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2015 Jul; 50 Suppl 2():1-4. PubMed ID: 26174912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seminal plasma damages sperm during cryopreservation, but its presence during thawing improves semen quality and conception rates in boars with poor post-thaw semen quality.
    Okazaki T; Abe S; Yoshida S; Shimada M
    Theriogenology; 2009 Feb; 71(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 18829093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility.
    Ruiz-Sánchez AL; O'donoghue R; Novak S; Dyck MK; Cosgrove JR; Dixon WT; Foxcroft GR
    Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):736-48. PubMed ID: 16529803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The incidence of agglutination and its influence on sperm quality and fertility of boar semen].
    Bollwein H; Petschow K; Weber F; Leiding C; Stolla R
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004; 117(7-8):327-33. PubMed ID: 15298061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
    Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-cell vs BTS extender.
    Haugan T; Gaustad AH; Reksen O; Gröhn YT; Hofmo PO
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Feb; 42(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 17214781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New aspects of boar semen freezing strategies.
    Grossfeld R; Sieg B; Struckmann C; Frenzel A; Maxwell WM; Rath D
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1225-33. PubMed ID: 18774169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro maturation and fertilization techniques for assessment of semen quality and boar fertility.
    Xu X; Pommier S; Arbov T; Hutchings B; Sotto W; Foxcroft GR
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Dec; 76(12):3079-89. PubMed ID: 9928613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction of genotype × artificial insemination conditions for male effect on fertility and prolificacy.
    Tusell L; García-Tomás M; Baselga M; Rekaya R; Rafel O; Ramon J; López-Bejar M; Piles M
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Nov; 88(11):3475-85. PubMed ID: 20729284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.