443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656255)
1. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: the impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength.
Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 18656255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique.
Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 18656254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite.
Curtis AR; Shortall AC; Marquis PM; Palin WM
J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18237839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Water sorption, solubility, and resultant change in strength among three resin-based dental composites.
Kumar N; Sangi L
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 May; 5(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 23188774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite.
Rodrigues SA; Scherrer SS; Ferracane JL; Della Bona A
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1281-8. PubMed ID: 18374408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotating fatigue and flexural strength of direct and indirect resin-composite restorative materials.
Mirmohammadi H; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 19824558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physical properties of current dental nanohybrid and nanofill light-cured resin composites.
Sideridou ID; Karabela MM; Vouvoudi ECh
Dent Mater; 2011 Jun; 27(6):598-607. PubMed ID: 21477852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of standardized flexure strength testing procedures for a light-activated resin-based composite.
Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):911-9. PubMed ID: 15927247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites.
Papadogiannis DY; Lakes RS; Papadogiannis Y; Palaghias G; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 17640723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites.
Beun S; Glorieux T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 16423384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The frictional coefficients and associated wear resistance of novel low-shrink resin-based composites.
Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Marquis PM; Pintado MR; Randall RC; Douglas WH
Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1111-8. PubMed ID: 16085304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites.
Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Marquis PM; Randall RC
Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):852-63. PubMed ID: 15935464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of filler loading on resin cement bonding to silanized buildup composites.
Kajihara H; Suzuki S; Minesaki Y; Kurashige H; Tanaka T
Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15973829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites.
Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC
Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction.
Cadenaro M; Marchesi G; Antoniolli F; Davidson C; De Stefano Dorigo E; Breschi L
Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 19136149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of strain rate and temperature on the mechanical properties of resin composites.
Musanje L; Darvell BW
Dent Mater; 2004 Oct; 20(8):750-65. PubMed ID: 15302456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanistic aspects of fatigue crack growth behavior in resin based dental restorative composites.
Shah MB; Ferracane JL; Kruzic JJ
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):909-16. PubMed ID: 19233460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flexure strength evaluation of a laboratory-processed fiber-reinforced composite resin.
Al-Darwish M; Hurley RK; Drummond JL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 17547944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration.
Salerno M; Derchi G; Thorat S; Ceseracciu L; Ruffilli R; Barone AC
Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1221-8. PubMed ID: 22000067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
