These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656255)

  • 1. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: the impact of dry and wet cyclic pre-loading on bi-axial flexure strength.
    Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 18656255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique.
    Curtis AR; Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 18656254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based composite.
    Curtis AR; Shortall AC; Marquis PM; Palin WM
    J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18237839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Water sorption, solubility, and resultant change in strength among three resin-based dental composites.
    Kumar N; Sangi L
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 May; 5(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 23188774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite.
    Rodrigues SA; Scherrer SS; Ferracane JL; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1281-8. PubMed ID: 18374408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rotating fatigue and flexural strength of direct and indirect resin-composite restorative materials.
    Mirmohammadi H; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 19824558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical properties of current dental nanohybrid and nanofill light-cured resin composites.
    Sideridou ID; Karabela MM; Vouvoudi ECh
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jun; 27(6):598-607. PubMed ID: 21477852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reliability of standardized flexure strength testing procedures for a light-activated resin-based composite.
    Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Oct; 21(10):911-9. PubMed ID: 15927247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites.
    Papadogiannis DY; Lakes RS; Papadogiannis Y; Palaghias G; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 17640723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites.
    Beun S; Glorieux T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 16423384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The frictional coefficients and associated wear resistance of novel low-shrink resin-based composites.
    Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Marquis PM; Pintado MR; Randall RC; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1111-8. PubMed ID: 16085304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites.
    Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Marquis PM; Randall RC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):852-63. PubMed ID: 15935464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of filler loading on resin cement bonding to silanized buildup composites.
    Kajihara H; Suzuki S; Minesaki Y; Kurashige H; Tanaka T
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15973829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites.
    Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction.
    Cadenaro M; Marchesi G; Antoniolli F; Davidson C; De Stefano Dorigo E; Breschi L
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 19136149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of strain rate and temperature on the mechanical properties of resin composites.
    Musanje L; Darvell BW
    Dent Mater; 2004 Oct; 20(8):750-65. PubMed ID: 15302456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanistic aspects of fatigue crack growth behavior in resin based dental restorative composites.
    Shah MB; Ferracane JL; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):909-16. PubMed ID: 19233460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexure strength evaluation of a laboratory-processed fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Al-Darwish M; Hurley RK; Drummond JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 17547944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration.
    Salerno M; Derchi G; Thorat S; Ceseracciu L; Ruffilli R; Barone AC
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1221-8. PubMed ID: 22000067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.