These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656295)

  • 21. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni CH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH; Queiroz CS
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21942235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19058889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nine-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.
    Peumans M; Wouters L; De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt K
    J Adhes Dent; 2018; 20(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 29904752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Kawasaki K; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 15978714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months.
    Perdigão J; Carmo AR; Anauate-Netto C; Amore R; Lewgoy HR; Cordeiro HJ; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 15973834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems.
    Scotti N; Comba A; Gambino A; Manzon E; Breschi L; Paolino D; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27093774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation.
    Moosavi H; Kimyai S; Forghani M; Khodadadi R
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22917442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S; van Noort R
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A 24-month randomized clinical trial of a two- and three-step etch-and-rinse technique.
    Reis A; Mânica D; Ferneda F; Amaral R; Stanislawczuk R; Manso A; De Carvalho RM; Loguercio AD
    Am J Dent; 2010 Aug; 23(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 21250576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
    Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive with additional enamel etching in Class III cavities.
    Ermis RB; Temel UB; Cellik EU; Kam O
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20420057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Lawson NC; Robles A; Fu CC; Lin CP; Sawlani K; Burgess JO
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 26231300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: results at one year.
    Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Sep; 53(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 18782367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Abdalla AI; El Sayed HY
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 19024260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition.
    Itthagarun A; Tay FR; Pashley DH; Wefel JS; García-Godoy F; Wei SH
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 15724748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.