These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18656641)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of routine radiographs after emergent open cavity operations.
    Dossett LA; Dittus RS; Speroff T; May AK; Cotton BA
    Surgery; 2008 Aug; 144(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 18656641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevention of retained surgical sponges: a decision-analytic model predicting relative cost-effectiveness.
    Regenbogen SE; Greenberg CC; Resch SC; Kollengode A; Cima RR; Zinner MJ; Gawande AA
    Surgery; 2009 May; 145(5):527-35. PubMed ID: 19375612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
    AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
    Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
    Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges.
    Rogers A; Jones E; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1235-7. PubMed ID: 17484000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The retained surgical sponge.
    Kaiser CW; Friedman S; Spurling KP; Slowick T; Kaiser HA
    Ann Surg; 1996 Jul; 224(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8678622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis and management of retained foreign objects.
    Yildirim T; Parlakgumus A; Yildirim S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 May; 25(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 26008665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retained surgical sponges: findings from incident reports and a cost-benefit analysis of radiofrequency technology.
    Williams TL; Tung DK; Steelman VM; Chang PK; Szekendi MK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Sep; 219(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 25081938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative radiography for evaluation of surgical miscounts.
    Walter WR; Amis ES; Sprayregen S; Haramati LB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 26044645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevention of retained surgical items.
    Feldman DL
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2011; 78(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 22069210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity.
    Ponrartana S; Coakley FV; Yeh BM; Breiman RS; Qayyum A; Joe BN; Poder L; Lu Y; Gibbs VC; Roberts JP
    Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18156915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for retained surgical items: a meta-analysis and proposed risk stratification system.
    Moffatt-Bruce SD; Cook CH; Steinberg SM; Stawicki SP
    J Surg Res; 2014 Aug; 190(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 24953990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
    Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical spine evaluation in urban trauma centers: lowering institutional costs and complications through helical CT scan.
    Grogan EL; Morris JA; Dittus RS; Moore DE; Poulose BK; Diaz JJ; Speroff T
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Feb; 200(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 15664088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery.
    Gawande AA; Studdert DM; Orav EJ; Brennan TA; Zinner MJ
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Jan; 348(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 12529464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical counts can be risky business!
    Porteous J
    Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2004 Dec; 22(4):6-8, 10, 12. PubMed ID: 15709630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).
    Bani-Hani KE; Gharaibeh KA; Yaghan RJ
    Asian J Surg; 2005 Apr; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15851364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients.
    Cima RR; Kollengode A; Garnatz J; Storsveen A; Weisbrod C; Deschamps C
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jul; 207(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18589366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of a protocol to reduce occurrence of retained sponges after vaginal delivery.
    Lutgendorf MA; Schindler LL; Hill JB; Magann EF; O'Boyle JD
    Mil Med; 2011 Jun; 176(6):702-4. PubMed ID: 21702393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.