These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18657093)

  • 1. Cost impact of diagnostic imaging for lower extremity peripheral vascular occlusive disease.
    Hay JW; Lawler E; Yucel K; Guo A; Balzer T; Gaziano JM; Scranton RE
    Value Health; 2009; 12(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 18657093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs and effects of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital substraction angiography on quality of life in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Bosma J; Dijksman LM; Lam K; Wisselink W; van Swijndregt AD; Vahl A
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Apr; 55(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 23939383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.
    Hoch JR; Tullis MJ; Kennell TW; McDermott J; Acher CW; Turnipseed WD
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 May; 23(5):792-800; discussion 801. PubMed ID: 8667500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging work-up and treatment for patients with intermittent claudication in The Netherlands.
    Visser K; de Vries SO; Kitslaar PJ; van Engelshoven JM; Hunink MG
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 25(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 12623332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pretreatment imaging workup for patients with intermittent claudication: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Visser K; Kuntz KM; Donaldson MC; Gazelle GS; Hunink MG
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 12525586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis.
    U-King-Im JM; Hollingworth W; Trivedi RA; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Graves MJ; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 14618366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective feasibility study of duplex ultrasound arterial mapping, digital-subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in management of critical lower limb ischemia by endovascular revascularization.
    Lowery AJ; Hynes N; Manning BJ; Mahendran M; Tawfik S; Sultan S
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2007 Jul; 21(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 17628263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costs in follow-up of endovascularly repaired abdominal aortic aneurysms. Magnetic resonance imaging with MR angiography versus EUROSTAR protocols.
    Engellau L; Albrechtsson U; Höjgård S; Norgren L; Larsson EM
    Int Angiol; 2003 Mar; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12771854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities: activity-based cost analysis.
    Stacul F; Pozzi-Mucelli F; Lubin E; Gava S; Cuttin-Zernich R; Grisi G; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 16623307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomised controlled diagnostic trial.
    Vahl AC; Geselschap J; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Smit J; Sala J; Turkcan K; Dijksman LM; Visser MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 May; 35(5):514-21; discussion 522-3. PubMed ID: 18201915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
    Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms.
    Schaafsma JD; Koffijberg H; Buskens E; Velthuis BK; van der Graaf Y; Rinkel GJ
    Stroke; 2010 Aug; 41(8):1736-42. PubMed ID: 20595661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
    Collins R; Cranny G; Burch J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R; Craig D; Wright K; Berry E; Gough M; Kleijnen J; Westwood M
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. PubMed ID: 17462170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of systemic arterial diseases with whole-body 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
    Lin J; Chen B; Wang JH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Nov; 119(21):1772-8. PubMed ID: 17097030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography.
    Cronberg CN; Sjöberg S; Albrechtsson U; Leander P; Lindh M; Norgren L; Danielsson P; Sonesson B; Larsson EM
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12631001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group.
    Baum RA; Rutter CM; Sunshine JH; Blebea JS; Blebea J; Carpenter JP; Dickey KW; Quinn SF; Gomes AS; Grist TM
    JAMA; 1995 Sep; 274(11):875-80. PubMed ID: 7674500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.