BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18658140)

  • 21. Effects of third-order torque on frictional force of self-ligating brackets.
    Muguruma T; Iijima M; Brantley WA; Ahluwalia KS; Kohda N; Mizoguchi I
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1054-61. PubMed ID: 24738791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An ex-vivo investigation into the effect of bracket displacement on the resistance to sliding.
    O'Reilly D; Dowling PA; Lagerstrom L; Swartz ML
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Sep; 26(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10532161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional relationship between the critical contact angle and the torque angle.
    Kang BS; Baek SH; Mah J; Yang WS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 12532065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of interbracket distances on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 17826605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation into the effects of stainless steel ligature ties on the mechanical characteristics of conventional and self-ligated brackets subjected to torque.
    Al Fakir H; Carey JP; Melenka GW; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 24596162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Third-order torque and self-ligating orthodontic bracket-type effects on sliding friction.
    Chung M; Nikolai RJ; Kim KB; Oliver DR
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 19413378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part II--The active configuration.
    Kusy RP; O'grady PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 11113803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frictional resistance to sliding archwires with repeated displacement.
    Liew CF; Brockhurst P; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 12462683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frictional behavior of stainless steel bracket-wire combinations subjected to small oscillating displacements.
    Willems G; Clocheret K; Celis JP; Verbeke G; Chatzicharalampous E; Carels C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 11606961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Oct; 35(5):610-4. PubMed ID: 22828075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Archwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance.
    Khambay B; Millett D; McHugh S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 15947232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):418-30. PubMed ID: 12940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.
    Papageorgiou SN; Sifakakis I; Doulis I; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():5. PubMed ID: 26780465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.
    Archambault A; Lacoursiere R; Badawi H; Major PW; Carey J; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):201-10. PubMed ID: 19852662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental evaluation of orthodontic bracket slot deformation to simulated torque.
    Magesh V; Harikrishnan P; Singh DKJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Aug; 235(8):940-946. PubMed ID: 33962528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of torque expression among passive self-ligating brackets with different slot depths: An in vitro study.
    Saraiva PC; Cruz MH; Medeiros IS; Bozelli JV; Neto JR; Paiva JB
    Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100866. PubMed ID: 38479220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions.
    Jakob SR; Matheus D; Jimenez-Pellegrin MC; Turssi CP; Amaral FL
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 25162570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.