These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18661151)

  • 1. Fetal leg posture in uncomplicated breech and cephalic pregnancies.
    Fong BF; Savelsbergh GJ; de Vries JI
    Eur J Pediatr; 2009 Apr; 168(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 18661151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of breech presentation on the development of fetal arm posture.
    Fong BF; Buis AJ; Savelsbergh GJ; de Vries JI
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Jun; 81(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 15935929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does intra-uterine environment influence fetal head-position preference? A comparison between breech and cephalic presentation.
    Fong BF; Savelsbergh GJ; van Geijn HP; de Vries JI
    Early Hum Dev; 2005 Jun; 81(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 15935928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of prenatal breech presentation on neonatal leg posture.
    Fong BF; Savelsbergh GJ; Leijsen MR; de Vries JI
    Early Hum Dev; 2009 Mar; 85(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19022592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of intra-uterine breech position on postnatal motor functions of the lower limbs.
    Sival DA; Prechtl HF; Sonder GH; Touwen BC
    Early Hum Dev; 1993 Mar; 32(2-3):161-76. PubMed ID: 8486118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of fetal behaviour in breech and cephalic presentations at term.
    Kean LH; Suwanrath C; Gargari SS; Sahota DS; James DK
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Nov; 106(11):1209-13. PubMed ID: 10549969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal motor activity in breech presentation.
    Luterkort M; Marsál K
    Early Hum Dev; 1985 Jan; 10(3-4):193-200. PubMed ID: 3987572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive factors and short-term fetal outcomes of breech presentation: a case-control study.
    Talas BB; Altinkaya SO; Talas H; Danisman N; Gungor T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 47(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 19126505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moxibustion for correction of breech presentation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cardini F; Weixin H
    JAMA; 1998 Nov; 280(18):1580-4. PubMed ID: 9820259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation.
    Luterkort M; Persson PH; Weldner BM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jul; 64(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 6738947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation: a matter of presentation.
    Melamed N; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Yogev Y; Pardo J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 21229551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conservative management in breech deliveries leads to similar results compared with cephalic deliveries.
    Molkenboer JF; Vencken PM; Sonnemans LG; Roumen FJ; Smits F; Buitendijk SE; Nijhuis JG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Aug; 20(8):599-603. PubMed ID: 17674277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sonographic weight estimation in fetuses with breech presentation.
    Dammer U; Goecke TW; Voigt F; Schmid M; Mayr A; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 May; 287(5):851-8. PubMed ID: 23224651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hip joint instability in breech pregnancy.
    Luterkort M; Persson PH; Polberger S; Bjerre I
    Acta Paediatr Scand; 1986 Sep; 75(5):860-3. PubMed ID: 3551486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of nuchal skin fold thickness in the second trimester: influence of imaging angle and fetal presentation.
    Cho JY; Kim KW; Lee YH; Toi A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 15736211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probability of breech presentation and its significance.
    Sekulić SR; Mikov A; Petrović DS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Oct; 23(10):1160-4. PubMed ID: 20230320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester.
    Westgren M; Edvall H; Nordström L; Svalenius E; Ranstam J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Jan; 92(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 3881123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fetal heart rate patterns using nonlinear dynamics in breech versus cephalic presentation at term.
    Park YS; Ryu KY; Shim SS; Hoh JK; Park MI
    Early Hum Dev; 2013 Feb; 89(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 22959071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased incidence of fetal growth restriction in association with breech presentation in preterm deliveries < 32 weeks.
    Sherer DM; Spong CY; Minior VK; Salafia CM
    Am J Perinatol; 1997 Jan; 14(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 9259894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value and pregnancy outcome of external cephalic version.
    Hindawi I
    East Mediterr Health J; 2005 Jul; 11(4):633-9. PubMed ID: 16700378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.