These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18661208)

  • 1. The change in retentive force of magnetic attachment by abrasion.
    Huang Y; Tawada Y; Hata Y; Watanabe F
    Odontology; 2008 Jul; 96(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 18661208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of repeated insertion-removal cycles on the force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachments: an in vitro study.
    Hao Z; Chao Y; Meng Y; Yin H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 24439071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.
    Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):487.e1-487.e12. PubMed ID: 35934574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of stable retentive properties of overdenture attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 16501313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retentive forces of two magnetic systems compared with two precision attachments.
    Saygili G; Sahmali S
    J Oral Sci; 1998 Jun; 40(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 9680762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trend of change in retentive force for bar attachments with different materials.
    Saito M; Kanazawa M; Takahashi H; Uo M; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1545-52. PubMed ID: 25023010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of cast Ti-Ni alloy clasp retention with conventional removable partial denture clasps.
    Kim D; Park C; Yi Y; Cho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):374-82. PubMed ID: 15116040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17207077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report.
    Ceruti P; Bryant SR; Lee JH; MacEntee MI
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a52. PubMed ID: 20943036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.