These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18661208)

  • 21. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of sterilization on the retention properties of magnetic attachments for dental implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19832767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Measurements of the flux densities of static magnetic fields generated by two types of dental magnetic attachments and their retentive forces].
    Xu C; Chao YL; Du L; Yang L
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 15181852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of spatial arrangement and clinical service lifetime simulation on the retention of magnetic units used in implant-anchored orbital prostheses.
    Artopoulou II; Zinelis S; Lemon JC; Polyzois G; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):811.e1-811.e9. PubMed ID: 36890002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New telescopic crown design for removable partial dentures.
    Minagi S; Natsuaki N; Nishigawa G; Sato T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jun; 81(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 10347356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the retentive characteristics of semi-precision extracoronal attachments.
    Hedzelek W; Rzatowski S; Czarnecka B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 38(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 20846216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Viability of magnetic denture retainers: a 3-year case report.
    Thean HP; Khor SK; Loh PL
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 11495563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic attachment for esthetic management of an overdenture.
    Kokubo Y; Fukushima S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):354-5. PubMed ID: 12426509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnet overdentures.
    Gillings BR
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1993; 7():13-21. PubMed ID: 8695187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention of ERA direct overdenture attachments before and after fatigue loading.
    Gamborena JI; Hazelton LR; NaBadalung D; Brudvik J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 9206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of interimplant distance and cyclic dislodgement on retention of LOCATOR and ball attachments: An in vitro study.
    Salehi R; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):550-556. PubMed ID: 31027962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.