BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18661419)

  • 1. The normal tissue sparing potential of adaptive strategies in radiotherapy of bladder cancer.
    Wright P; Redpath AT; Høyer M; Grau C; Muren LP
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1382-9. PubMed ID: 18661419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for bladder cancer: isocentre shifts, margins and their impact on target dose.
    Redpath AT; Muren LP
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17113669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of on-line correction for rotational organ motion in image-guided radiotherapy of the bladder and prostate.
    Redpath AT; Wright P; Muren LP
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1367-72. PubMed ID: 18661436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-fractional bladder motion and margins in adaptive radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer.
    Grønborg C; Vestergaard A; Høyer M; Söhn M; Pedersen EM; Petersen JB; Agerbæk M; Muren LP
    Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(9):1461-6. PubMed ID: 26313410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Organ motion, set-up variation and treatment margins in radical radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer.
    Muren LP; Smaaland R; Dahl O
    Radiother Oncol; 2003 Dec; 69(3):291-304. PubMed ID: 14644489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a feasibility study.
    Pos FJ; Hulshof M; Lebesque J; Lotz H; van Tienhoven G; Moonen L; Remeijer P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):862-8. PubMed ID: 16458776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An optimisation algorithm for determination of treatment margins around moving and deformable targets.
    Redpath AT; Muren LP
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 16209894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Online adaptive radiotherapy of the bladder: small bowel irradiated-volume reduction.
    Burridge N; Amer A; Marchant T; Sykes J; Stratford J; Henry A; McBain C; Price P; Moore C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):892-7. PubMed ID: 17011462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer: bladder volume variation and its relation to margins.
    Muren LP; Redpath AT; Lord H; McLaren D
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Sep; 84(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 17692417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic variations due to radical prostatectomy. Impact on target volume definition and dose-volume parameters of rectum and bladder.
    Sanguineti G; Castellone P; Foppiano F; Franzone P; Marcenaro M; Tognoni P; Bolognesi A; Ceresoli GL; Fiorino C
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 15378187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to individualize adaptive planning target volumes for deformable targets.
    Wright P; Redpath AT; Høyer M; Muren LP
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(23):7121-33. PubMed ID: 19904035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bladder cancer radiotherapy margins: a comparison of daily alignment using skin, bone or soft tissue.
    Foroudi F; Pham D; Bressel M; Wong J; Rolfo A; Roxby P; Kron T
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2012 Dec; 24(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 22858439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of image registration surrogates on the planning target volume geometry for bladder radiation therapy.
    Kong V; Kwan M; Chen S; Moseley J; Craig T; Chung P; Rosewall T
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(5):e187-e194. PubMed ID: 26922699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of margins, integral dose and interfraction target coverage with image-guided radiotherapy compared with non-image-guided radiotherapy for bladder cancer.
    Foroudi F; Pham D; Bressel M; Hardcastle N; Gill S; Kron T
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2014 Aug; 26(8):497-505. PubMed ID: 24726459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between two clinically applied plan library strategies in adaptive radiotherapy of bladder cancer.
    Tuomikoski L; Valli A; Tenhunen M; Muren L; Vestergaard A
    Radiother Oncol; 2015 Dec; 117(3):448-52. PubMed ID: 26577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating inter-fractional changes in volume and position during bladder radiotherapy and the effect of volume limitation as a method of reducing the internal margin of the planning target volume.
    Mangar SA; Miller NR; Khoo VS; Hansen V; McNair H; Horwich A; Huddart RA
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2008 Nov; 20(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 18835026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of changes in bladder and rectal filling volume on organ motion and dose distribution of the bladder in radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer.
    Fokdal L; Honoré H; Høyer M; Meldgaard P; Fode K; von der Maase H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):436-44. PubMed ID: 15145160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A concomitant tumour boost in bladder irradiation: patient suitability and the potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Muren LP; Redpath AT; McLaren D; Rørvik J; Halvorsen OJ; Høstmark J; Bakke A; Thwaites D; Dahl O
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jul; 80(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 16876274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies to reduce the systematic error due to tumor and rectum motion in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
    Hoogeman MS; van Herk M; de Bois J; Lebesque JV
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Feb; 74(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 15734206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.