BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18661435)

  • 1. Acceleration and validation of optical flow based deformable registration for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Østergaard Noe K; De Senneville BD; Elstrøm UV; Tanderup K; Sørensen TS
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 18661435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shading correction algorithm for improvement of cone-beam CT images in radiotherapy.
    Marchant TE; Moore CJ; Rowbottom CG; MacKay RI; Williams PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5719-33. PubMed ID: 18824785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy.
    Wang H; Dong L; O'Daniel J; Mohan R; Garden AS; Ang KK; Kuban DA; Bonnen M; Chang JY; Cheung R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2887-905. PubMed ID: 15930609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GPU-based streaming architectures for fast cone-beam CT image reconstruction and demons deformable registration.
    Sharp GC; Kandasamy N; Singh H; Folkert M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5771-83. PubMed ID: 17881799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance.
    Létourneau D; Wong R; Moseley D; Sharpe MB; Ansell S; Gospodarowicz M; Jaffray DA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1229-37. PubMed ID: 17336223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deformable planning CT to cone-beam CT image registration in head-and-neck cancer.
    Hou J; Guerrero M; Chen W; D'Souza WD
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2088-94. PubMed ID: 21626941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Thomas TH; Devakumar D; Purnima S; Ravindran BP
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2067-77. PubMed ID: 19287087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of Cone-Beam CT scan time without compromising the accuracy of the image registration in IGRT.
    Westberg J; Jensen HR; Bertelsen A; Brink C
    Acta Oncol; 2010; 49(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 20100157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FEM-based evaluation of deformable image registration for radiation therapy.
    Zhong H; Peters T; Siebers JV
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4721-38. PubMed ID: 17671331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of similarity measures for reconstruction-based registration in image-guided radiotherapy and surgery.
    Skerl D; Tomazevic D; Likar B; Pernus F
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):943-53. PubMed ID: 16751077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT with local intensity matching.
    Park S; Plishker W; Quon H; Wong J; Shekhar R; Lee J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):927-947. PubMed ID: 28074785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical-based image registration for head and neck radiation treatment.
    Al-Mayah A; Moseley J; Hunter S; Velec M; Chau L; Breen S; Brock K
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6491-500. PubMed ID: 20959687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonrigid patient setup errors in the head-and-neck region.
    Polat B; Wilbert J; Baier K; Flentje M; Guckenberger M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Sep; 183(9):506-11. PubMed ID: 17762925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone beam CT evaluation of patient set-up accuracy as a QA tool.
    Nielsen M; Bertelsen A; Westberg J; Jensen HR; Brink C
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 18759138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Block Matching deformable registration algorithm in the field of head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy.
    Huger S; Graff P; Harter V; Marchesi V; Royer P; Diaz JC; Aouadi S; Wolf D; Peiffert D; Noel A
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24090743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auto-propagation of contours for adaptive prostate radiation therapy.
    Chao M; Xie Y; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4533-42. PubMed ID: 18677041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated landmark-guided deformable image registration.
    Kearney V; Chen S; Gu X; Chiu T; Liu H; Jiang L; Wang J; Yordy J; Nedzi L; Mao W
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):101-16. PubMed ID: 25479095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GPU accelerated viscous-fluid deformable registration for radiotherapy.
    Noe KØ; Tanderup K; Lindegaard JC; Grau C; Sørensen TS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():327-32. PubMed ID: 18391314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.