159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18661453)
1. Participation in cervical cancer screening by age and region--a cohort study with a 3 1/2 year follow-up on 2,223,135 women in Bavaria.
Rückinger S; Tauscher M; Redel R; Munte A; Walchner-Bonjean M; Hess J; Schneider A; von Kries R
Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e17-21. PubMed ID: 18661453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for cervical carcinoma.
van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marrying research, clinical practice and cervical screening in Australian Aboriginal women in western New South Wales, Australia.
Read CM; Bateson DJ
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(2):1117. PubMed ID: 19459723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Women's participation in a cervical cancer screening program in northern Peru.
Winkler J; Bingham A; Coffey P; Handwerker WP
Health Educ Res; 2008 Feb; 23(1):10-24. PubMed ID: 17229778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Participation in cervical cancer screening in Germany.
Klug SJ; Taylor KJ; Scheidemann-Wesp U; Lautz D; Güther B; Potthoff P; Blettner M
Prev Med; 2010 Nov; 51(5):431-2. PubMed ID: 20736032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.
Aklimunnessa K; Mori M; Khan MM; Sakauchi F; Kubo T; Fujino Y; Suzuki S; Tokudome S; Tamakoshi A; ; Motohashi Y; Tsuji I; Nakamura Y; Iso H; Mikami H; Inaba Y; Hoshiyama Y; Suzuki H; Shimizu H; Toyoshima H; Wakai K; Ito Y; Hashimoto S; Kikuchi S; Koizumi A; Kawamura T; Watanabe Y; Miki T; Date C; Sakata K; Nose T; Hayakawa N; Yoshimura T; Shibata A; Okamoto N; Shino H; Ohno Y; Kitagawa T; Kuroki T; Tajima K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 36(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 16844732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of rural women's knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe.
Mangoma JF; Chirenje MZ; Chimbari MJ; Chandiwana SK
Afr J Reprod Health; 2006 Apr; 10(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 16999199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008.
Armour BS; Thierry JM; Wolf LA
Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19879454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening.
Bray F; Loos AH; McCarron P; Weiderpass E; Arbyn M; Møller H; Hakama M; Parkin DM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar; 14(3):677-86. PubMed ID: 15767349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current techniques in screening for cervical cancer in Spain: updated recommendations.
Puig-Tintoré LM; Torné A; Alonso I
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep; 110(3 Suppl 2):S8-S10. PubMed ID: 18606440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
de Jonge E; Cloes E; Op de Beeck L; Adriaens B; Lousbergh D; Orye GG; Buntinx F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer risk factors and predictors of cervical dysplasia among women in south-west Nigeria.
Ogunbowale T; Lawoyin TO
Aust J Rural Health; 2008 Dec; 16(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 19032205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommendations for cervical cancer prevention in Asia Pacific.
Garland SM; Cuzick J; Domingo EJ; Goldie SJ; Kim YT; Konno R; Parkin DM; Qiao YL; Sankaranarayanan R; Stern PL; Tay SK; Bosch FX
Vaccine; 2008 Aug; 26 Suppl 12():M89-98. PubMed ID: 18945418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
