These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Economou NC; Ferekidis E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry. Mathur NN; Dhawan R J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Evaluation of a linear TEOAE protocol in hearing screening of neonates: feasibility study]. Pelosi G; Hatzopoulos S; Chierici R; Vigi V; Martini A Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Aug; 18(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 10205919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Neonatal hearing screening using a smartphone-based otoacoustic emission device: A comparative study. Madzivhandila AG; le Roux T; Biagio de Jager L Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Feb; 177():111862. PubMed ID: 38295684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A TEOAE screening protocol based on linear click stimuli: performance and scoring criteria. Hatzopoulos S; Petruccelli J; Pelosi G; Martini A Acta Otolaryngol; 1999 Mar; 119(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 10320062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Neonatal hearing screening: a combined click evoked and tone burst otoacoustic emission approach. Zhang VW; McPherson B; Shi BX; Tang JL; Wong BY Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 72(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 18178260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficient otoacoustic emission protocols employed in a hospital-based neonatal screening program. Hatzopoulos S; Pelosi G; Petruccelli J; Rossi M; Vigi V; Chierici R; Martini A Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 11349794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response. Suppiej A; Rizzardi E; Zanardo V; Franzoi M; Ermani M; Orzan E Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 17317296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The performance of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response in the same ear of the babies in neonatal unit. Abdul Wahid SN; Md Daud MK; Sidek D; Abd Rahman N; Mansor S; Zakaria MN Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1366-9. PubMed ID: 22770594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne. Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline. Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Newborn oto-acoustic emission hearing screening tests: preliminary evidence for a marker of susceptibility to SIDS. Rubens DD; Vohr BR; Tucker R; O'Neil CA; Chung W Early Hum Dev; 2008 Apr; 84(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 17614220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]