These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18663614)
1. Factors affecting the eating quality of pork. Ngapo TM; Gariepy C Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2008 Aug; 48(7):599-633. PubMed ID: 18663614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting the water holding capacity of red meat products: a review of recent research advances. Cheng Q; Sun DW Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2008 Feb; 48(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18274969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of production system in local and conventional pig breeds on stress indicators at slaughter, muscle and meat traits and pork eating quality. Lebret B; Ecolan P; Bonhomme N; Méteau K; Prunier A Animal; 2015 Aug; 9(8):1404-13. PubMed ID: 25908582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preslaughter handling effects on pork quality and glycolytic potential in two muscles differing in fiber type composition. Hambrecht E; Eissen JJ; Newman DJ; Smits CH; Verstegen MW; den Hartog LA J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):900-7. PubMed ID: 15753346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-slaughter handling and pork quality. Vermeulen L; Van de Perre V; Permentier L; De Bie S; Verbeke G; Geers R Meat Sci; 2015 Feb; 100():118-23. PubMed ID: 25460114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: development of a market conformity tool for pork products based on technological quality traits. Gonzàlez J; Gispert M; Gil M; Hviid M; Dourmad JY; de Greef KH; Zimmer C; Fàbrega E Animal; 2014 Dec; 8(12):2038-46. PubMed ID: 25196445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of different chilling methods on meat quality and calpain activity of pork muscle longissimus dorsi. Xu Y; Huang JC; Huang M; Xu BC; Zhou GH J Food Sci; 2012 Jan; 77(1):C27-32. PubMed ID: 22260101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Production systems and influence on eating quality of pork. Bonneau M; Lebret B Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 20374788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops. Rincker PJ; Killefer J; Ellis M; Brewer MS; McKeith FK J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):730-7. PubMed ID: 18156359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between longissimus glycolytic potential and swine growth performance, carcass traits, and pork quality. Hamilton DN; Miller KD; Ellis M; McKeith FK; Wilson ER J Anim Sci; 2003 Sep; 81(9):2206-12. PubMed ID: 12968695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public health and pork: pre-harvest food safety and slaughter perspectives. Blaha T Rev Sci Tech; 1997 Aug; 16(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 9501362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants. Hambrecht E; Eissen JJ; Nooijent RI; Ducro BJ; Smits CH; den Hartog LA; Verstegen MW J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1401-9. PubMed ID: 15144080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pork loin quality is not indicative of fresh belly or fresh and cured ham quality. Arkfeld EK; Wilson KB; Overholt MF; Harsh BN; Lowell JE; Hogan EK; Klehm BJ; Bohrer BM; Mohrhauser DA; King DA; Wheeler TL; Dilger AC; Shackelford SD; Boler DD J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5155-5167. PubMed ID: 28046183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]