These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18664707)

  • 21. Effects of gender on listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility.
    Ellis L; Reynolds L; Fucci D; Benjamin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):771-5. PubMed ID: 8961314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
    Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of loud and amplified speech on sentence and word intelligibility in Parkinson disease.
    Neel AT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):1021-33. PubMed ID: 18978211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of listening strategies for the speech of individuals with dysarthria and cerebral palsy.
    Hustad KC; Dardis CM; Kramper AJ
    Augment Altern Commun; 2011 Mar; 27(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 21355809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodological aspects of assessing speech intelligibility among children with impaired hearing.
    Huttunen K; Sorri M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 15224881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Munich Intelligibility Profile. Studies of reliability and validity].
    Ziegler W; Hartmann E
    Nervenarzt; 1993 Oct; 64(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 8232679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Listener-assessed intelligibility of hearing aid-processed speech.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 738919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test.
    Giguère C; Laroche C; Soli SD; Vaillancourt V
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 18569104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
    Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of listening conditions and listener characteristics on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Pennington L; Miller N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 May; 21(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 17468997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A statistical causal model for the assessment of dysarthric speech and the utility of computer-based speech recognition.
    Sy BK; Horowitz DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Dec; 40(12):1282-98. PubMed ID: 8125504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The Freiburg monosyllabic test put to the test].
    Baljić I; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):538-9. PubMed ID: 27455987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 25879238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Segal O; Algom D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):956-72. PubMed ID: 19064905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing loss and radiotelephony intelligibility in civilian airline pilots.
    van Deelen GW; Blom JH
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1990 Jan; 61(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2302128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subjective judgments of speech clarity measured by paired comparisons and category rating.
    Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Gornbein JA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 9288475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction.
    Sarampalis A; Kalluri S; Edwards B; Hafter E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 19380604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.