These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18664708)

  • 1. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sophisticated and naïve listeners' magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance.
    Ellis LW; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1231-4. PubMed ID: 10939074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech acceptability.
    Ellis LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):625-30. PubMed ID: 10483655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: experts' opinions and naive normal-hearing listeners' performance.
    Hilkhuysen GL; Gaubitch N; Huckvale M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):404-15. PubMed ID: 23090965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of listeners' experience on two measures of intelligibility.
    Ellis LW; Fucci DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1099-104. PubMed ID: 1501975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of speaker gender on listener judgments of tracheoesophageal speech.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC; Hansen K; Beaudin PG
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance by mothers of children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Ellis LW; Pakulski L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):324-8. PubMed ID: 12705540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.