519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18664838)
1. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of intra-adnexal and extra-adnexal computed tomographic imaging features diagnosing torsion of adnexal tumor.
Lee JH; Park SB; Shin SH; Jang JC; Lee WC; Jeong AK; Yang MJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):872-6. PubMed ID: 19940653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis.
Hricak H; Chen M; Coakley FV; Kinkel K; Yu KK; Sica G; Bacchetti P; Powell CB
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10644099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing component on CT to predict malignancy in cystic renal masses and interobserver agreement of different CT features.
Benjaminov O; Atri M; O'Malley M; Lobo K; Tomlinson G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 16498093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Toussaint I; Perrot N; Rouzier R; Cuenod CA; Bazot M; Daraï E
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):793-803. PubMed ID: 21193596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging characterization of adnexal lesions: Do CT findings correlate with US?
Baheti AD; Lewis CE; Hippe DS; O'Malley RB; Wang CL
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1764-1771. PubMed ID: 29043402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of tubo-ovarian abscess mimicking adnexal masses: Comparison between contrast-enhanced CT,
Fan H; Wang TT; Ren G; Fu HL; Wu XR; Chu CT; Li WH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29458901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Aubert E; Rockall A; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Rouzier R; Daraï E; Bazot M
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 23468574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Barros RHO; Baião AC; Parente DB; Derchain S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses.
Atri M; Tabatabaeifar L; Jang HJ; Finelli A; Moshonov H; Jewett M
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 25919803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular network assessment of adnexal masses: intraobserver and interobserver agreement analysis.
Alcázar JL; Cabrera C; Galván R; Guerriero S
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):997-1001. PubMed ID: 18577662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Torashima M; Hatanaka Y; Harada M; Higashida Y; Takahashi M; Mizutani H; Tashiro H; Iwamasa J; Miyazaki K
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):557-65. PubMed ID: 7824738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system based on enhanced non-DCE MRI in the assessment of adnexal masses.
Wu M; Tang Q; Cai S; Zhu L; Lin C; Guan Y; Rao S; Zhou J
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Feb; 159():110670. PubMed ID: 36584564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of adnexal mass: is unenhanced CT scan necessary?
Jung SI; Park HS; Kim YJ; Jeon HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 24497795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
