180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18665020)
1. Women in the Netherlands prefer self-sampling with a novel lavaging device to clinician collection of specimens for cervical cancer screening.
Jones HE; Wiegerinck MA; Nieboer TE; Mol BW; Westhoff CL
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11):916-7. PubMed ID: 18665020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability of self-collection of specimens for HPV DNA testing in an urban population.
Anhang R; Nelson JA; Telerant R; Chiasson MA; Wright TC
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):721-8. PubMed ID: 16232104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-sampling versus physician-sampling for human papillomavirus testing.
Agorastos T; Dinas K; Lloveras B; Font R; Kornegay JR; Bontis J; de Sanjose S
Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Nov; 16(11):727-9. PubMed ID: 16303065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The acceptability of a self-lavaging device compared to pelvic examination for cervical cancer screening among low-income women.
Jones HE; Brudney K; Sawo DJ; Lantigua R; Westhoff CL
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2012 Dec; 21(12):1275-81. PubMed ID: 22906043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus in specimens collected with a novel self-sampling device.
Castle PE; Aftab A; Saint-Jean G; Mendez L
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 44(6):2158-9. PubMed ID: 16757614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Self-sampling at home can prevent cervix cancer].
Sanner K; Wikström I; Lindell M; Strand A; Wilander E
Lakartidningen; 2009 Nov 11-17; 106(46):3075-7. PubMed ID: 19998610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The potential role of self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus detection in cervical cancer screening.
Schmeink CE; Bekkers RL; Massuger LF; Melchers WJ
Rev Med Virol; 2011 May; 21(3):139-53. PubMed ID: 21538664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of self-collected and clinician-collected materials for cervical cytology and human papillomavirus genotyping: analysis by linear array assay.
Yoshida T; Sano T; Takada N; Kanuma T; Inoue H; Itoh T; Yazaki C; Obara M; Fukuda T
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 21135530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human papilloma virus testing of vaginal smear obtained with a novel self-sampling device.
Stenvall H; Wikström I; Wilander E
Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(5):465-7. PubMed ID: 16955203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the acceptability of two self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus testing in the cervical screening context: a qualitative study of Muslim women in London.
Szarewski A; Cadman L; Ashdown-Barr L; Waller J
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 20054094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Letter to the editor concerning Petignat et al.'s "Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis." Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(2): 530-535.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):595-6; author reply 596-7. PubMed ID: 17904206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Offering Self-Sampling to Non-Attendees of Organized Primary HPV Screening: When Do Harms Outweigh the Benefits?
Rozemeijer K; de Kok IM; Naber SK; van Kemenade FJ; Penning C; van Rosmalen J; van Ballegooijen M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 May; 24(5):773-82. PubMed ID: 25432954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A tissue basis for colposcopic findings.
O'Connor DM
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):565-82; viii. PubMed ID: 19061817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASC-US diagnosis and triage.
Del Mistro A
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S2-4. PubMed ID: 17727939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence and genotype distribution of multiple human papillomavirus infection in the uterine cervix: a 7.5-year longitudinal study in a routine cytology-based screening population in West Germany.
Kovács K; Varnai AD; Bollmann M; Bankfalvi A; Szendy M; Speich N; Schmitt C; Pajor L; Bollmann R
J Med Virol; 2008 Oct; 80(10):1814-23. PubMed ID: 18712836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary evaluation of a cervical self-sampling device with liquid-based cytology and multiparameter molecular testing.
Knesel BW; Dry JC; Wald-Scott C; Aftab A
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 15916209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-collected human papillomavirus testing acceptability: comparison of two self-sampling modalities.
Igidbashian S; Boveri S; Spolti N; Radice D; Sandri MT; Sideri M
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Mar; 20(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 21351869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The significance of the endocervical cells in the cervical smear and a new technic for the collection of endocervical smears].
Trimbos JB; Peters AA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Jan; 130(4):162-5. PubMed ID: 3951609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Human papillomavirus self-sampling for screening nonattenders: Opt-in pilot implementation with electronic communication platforms.
Lam JU; Rebolj M; Møller Ejegod D; Pedersen H; Rygaard C; Lynge E; Thirstrup Thomsen L; Krüger Kjaer S; Bonde J
Int J Cancer; 2017 May; 140(10):2212-2219. PubMed ID: 28195317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
