BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18665426)

  • 1. Two novel closure rules for constructing phylogenetic super-networks.
    Grünewald S; Huber KT; Wu Q
    Bull Math Biol; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1906-24. PubMed ID: 18665426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
    Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.
    Huson DH; Bryant D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harvesting evolutionary signals in a forest of prokaryotic gene trees.
    Schliep K; Lopez P; Lapointe FJ; Bapteste E
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):1393-405. PubMed ID: 21172835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study.
    Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of polyploids from multilabeled trees.
    Huber KT; Oxelman B; Lott M; Moulton V
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16798795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Missing the forest for the trees: phylogenetic compression and its implications for inferring complex evolutionary histories.
    Ané C; Sanderson M
    Syst Biol; 2005 Feb; 54(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 15805016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of phylogenetic inconsistencies in the three domains of life.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Castresana J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Nov; 25(11):2319-29. PubMed ID: 18701430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QNet: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks from weighted quartets.
    Grünewald S; Forslund K; Dress A; Moulton V
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):532-8. PubMed ID: 17119010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tripartitions do not always discriminate phylogenetic networks.
    Cardona G; Rosselló F; Valiente G
    Math Biosci; 2008 Feb; 211(2):356-70. PubMed ID: 18177903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closure operations in phylogenetics.
    Grünewald S; Steel M; Swenson MS
    Math Biosci; 2007 Aug; 208(2):521-37. PubMed ID: 17303190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing circular phylogenetic networks from weighted quartets using simulated annealing.
    Eslahchi C; Hassanzadeh R; Mottaghi E; Habibi M; Pezeshk H; Sadeghi M
    Math Biosci; 2012 Feb; 235(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 22108294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fully resolved consensus between fully resolved phylogenetic trees.
    Quitzau JA; Meidanis J
    Genet Mol Res; 2006 Mar; 5(1):269-83. PubMed ID: 16755517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An algorithm for constructing local regions in a phylogenetic network.
    Huber KT; Watson EE; Hendy MD
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2001 Apr; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11286486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
    Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
    C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BIMLR: a method for constructing rooted phylogenetic networks from rooted phylogenetic trees.
    Wang J; Guo M; Xing L; Che K; Liu X; Wang C
    Gene; 2013 Sep; 527(1):344-51. PubMed ID: 23816409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A major clade of prokaryotes with ancient adaptations to life on land.
    Battistuzzi FU; Hedges SB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Feb; 26(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 18988685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Networks in phylogenetic analysis: new tools for population biology.
    Morrison DA
    Int J Parasitol; 2005 Apr; 35(5):567-82. PubMed ID: 15826648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constraints in naming parts of the Tree of Life.
    Hillis DM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 16997582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast computation of supertrees for compatible phylogenies with nested taxa.
    Berry V; Semple C
    Syst Biol; 2006 Apr; 55(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 16611599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.