These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18665723)

  • 41. The representation selection problem: Why we should favor the geometric-module framework of spatial reorientation over the view-matching framework.
    Duval A
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103985. PubMed ID: 31234079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neural network processing of natural language: II. Towards a unified model of corticostriatal function in learning sentence comprehension and non-linguistic sequencing.
    Dominey PF; Inui T; Hoen M
    Brain Lang; 2009; 109(2-3):80-92. PubMed ID: 18835637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Consciousness and metarepresentation: a computational sketch.
    Cleeremans A; Timmermans B; Pasquali A
    Neural Netw; 2007 Nov; 20(9):1032-9. PubMed ID: 17904799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape.
    Alexander T; Wilson SP; Wilson PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
    Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Get out of the corner: Inhibition and the effect of location type and number on perceptron and human reorientation.
    Dupuis B; Dawson MR
    Learn Behav; 2013 Dec; 41(4):360-78. PubMed ID: 23709118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Independent effects of geometry and landmark in a spontaneous reorientation task: a study of two species of fish.
    Lee SA; Vallortigara G; Ruga V; Sovrano VA
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 22610461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reorienting in images of a three-dimensional environment.
    Kelly DM; Bischof WF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1391-403. PubMed ID: 16366797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The potentiation of geometry by features in human children: Evidence against modularity in the domain of navigation.
    Lourenco SF; Cabrera J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Dec; 140():184-96. PubMed ID: 26254274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Forloines MR; Bodily KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 22218783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans.
    Siemens MN; Kelly DM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):566-576. PubMed ID: 29282642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Location representation in enclosed spaces: what types of information afford young children an advantage?
    Lourenco SF; Addy D; Huttenlocher J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Nov; 104(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19560782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparing black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli): use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task.
    Batty ER; Bloomfield LL; Spetch ML; Sturdy CB
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jul; 12(4):633-41. PubMed ID: 19381699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spatial reorientation with a geometric array of auditory cues.
    Nardi D; Carpenter SE; Johnson SR; Gilliland GA; Melo VL; Pugliese R; Coppola VJ; Kelly DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Feb; 75(2):362-373. PubMed ID: 32111145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Children's use of geometry for reorientation.
    Lee SA; Spelke ES
    Dev Sci; 2008 Sep; 11(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 18801130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ants learn geometry and features.
    Wystrach A; Beugnon G
    Curr Biol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 19119010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23370045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. 25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective.
    Cheng K; Huttenlocher J; Newcombe NS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1033-54. PubMed ID: 23456412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 19576273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dynamic liquid association: complex learning without implausible guidance.
    Morse A; Aktius M
    Neural Netw; 2009 Sep; 22(7):875-89. PubMed ID: 19117723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.